Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

Liberty Politics Discussion

4.4k members • Free

38 contributions to Liberty Politics Discussion
THE THREAT WITHIN
The threat posed by Radical Militant Islamist ideology represents the greatest near and long-term threat to American freedom — yet one critical dimension remains largely overlooked: the construction of durable, institution-based influence networks operating inside the United States through religious, educational, and nonprofit structures. For detailed information refer to the NUFDI publication linked below. https://nufdiran.org/reports/the-islamic-republics-influence-network-in-the-united-states-part-one/
THE THREAT WITHIN
0 likes • 3d
This reminds me of the college I attended. My college boasted valuing human rights and respect and dignity for all people. Yet, one of the professors at my college was literally the former Ambassador for the Islamic Republic to the United Nations during the 1980s. He specialized in "friendship and forgiveness studies". It is just sobering how these networks exist, yet people still say the Islamic Regime does not pose a threat.
1 like • 3d
Side note: I honestly want to learn more about this. The history of the English language is really fascinating. The English language is heavily influenced by French actually because of William the Conqueror and the Franco-Normandy invasion of England. Because of this, French was the ruling language of England for a long time. However, eventually the Franco-Normandy ruling class in England eventually integrated into England and started seeing themselves as English and as distinct from the Normandy Kingdom across the channel (kind of like how the Mongols integrated into China during the Yuan Dynasty instead of forcing Chinese to adopt Mongol customs). With this change in perception of identity as well as Geoffrey Chaucer's "The Canterbury Tales", the English language was revived especially in literature. Because of the integration of other languages like French and German, a lot of native English (Anglo-Saxon) words have been lost. I think only about 4,500 words of Anglo-Saxon origin are in use today. But! We use a lot of these Anglo-Saxon words in our daily lives. Some of the words include: water, apple, two, king, bread, eight, etc. Also, in English, we used to have have honorific "you" which was actually the word "you". The pronoun "you" and possessive pronoun "your" were actually honorific. "Thee" and "thou" were causal. You can see the interactions between the honorific and the casual in Shakespeare. This is also why the Quakers always used "thee" and "thou" because it was more humble and casual. TLDR: Anyways! The history of the English language is more complicated than what it appears it be. Origins of words should not be used to assert a certain narrative.
Illiteracy myth-thoughts?
https://youtube.com/shorts/91G2zp3Cuj4?si=q9GKDqSpE0FVrnNV
1 like • 5d
I can only comment on my personal experiences working in education and working in schools. When I hear about the literacy crisis, I almost always hear it in reference to children and how children are not at grade level for reading in addition to math. In my personal experience, kids are not mastering their foundational skills. Here is the problem: think of knowledge as a pyramid. Your foundational skills are the base of the pyramid. As you go up the pyramid, your knowledge becomes more detailed and complicated. Then, the top of the pyramid represents specialized information you get from years of study. It is really hard to understand and build upon your set of knowledge when your foundation is not strong. (If this makes sense? This might be a bad explanation). Also, something to keep in mind, there is a teacher shortage in the USA right now. Teachers are rapidly quitting education. I'm not saying one is causing the other, but I do think there are some problems that need to be addressed in education.
What's the deal with elephants?
Do you know abut The elephant in the room? The silence surrounding the 'elephant' is what perpetuates the problem. To solve a problem, the first step is acknowledging its existence. 'Naming' the problem, saying what everyone is not saing. Then real work toward a solution begins. This is one of the most important skills in leadership and critical thinking: the ability to identify what everyone is trying to suppress, and to find the right, courageous, and effective way to bring it to the surface. From here, we need to be careful not to fall to the second trap ​The parable of the blind men and the elephant is a timeless story of Indian origin that explores the subjective nature of truth and the limitations of human perception. ​The Narrative. ​A group of blind men are asked to describe an elephant by touch. Because they have never encountered one before, each man explores a different part of the animal and draws his own conclusion based on that limited contact. ​ ​The story illustrates that while each individual's observation is technically "true" based on their specific experience, it is an incomplete representation of the whole. It highlights how easily we mistake our limited, subjective perspectives for objective truth. It encourages intellectual humility, suggesting that to understand a complex reality whether in politics, social issues, or interpersonal relationships, one must synthesize the diverse, often conflicting viewpoints of others rather than insisting on the exclusivity of one's own. Good luck to all of us .
What's the deal with elephants?
1 like • 7d
My second thought is I really like how you mentioned in the story that even though each individual's observation was technically "true" based on their experience with the elephant, it is still just based on their subjective experience. I don't like it when someone refers to their subjective experience as "their truth". Truth has a specific meaning. It is based on proven facts and objective reality. We all live our lives individually. As a result, all of our experiences will be our own. Because our experiences are our own, everything will at least be slightly different for all of us, and we will interpret our experiences at least slightly different too. If we all have our own "truths" that are all at least slight different from one another, then what is truth?
1 like • 5d
@Hila Lala Absolutely. I love the metaphor of the elephant Hila. What you describe is a great way of approaching people with views different than our own, and I appreciate you giving us all the space to think about it and talk about it.
2 likes • 7d
This is heartwarming ❤️
1-10 of 38
Amanda T
4
73points to level up
@amanda-tennant-5426
I like guinea pigs, pandas, and learning new things. Literature girly. I'm an American living in Tokyo

Active 3d ago
Joined Mar 5, 2026
Powered by