For me, the easiest way to reconcile this passage is to just let the passage say what it says. Jesus did become fully human, and we all know that came with legit limitations, and that's okay, it doesn't diminish who He is. Luke 2:52 literally says that He grew in wisdom, so at some point He knew things He hadn't known before. That doesn't make Him stop being God, it just means that in incarnation was real and it wasn't just God wearing a flesh costume. Like in Philippians 2, He humbled Himself and took the form of a servant. So He voluntarily lived within the limits of being human, another reason why His sacrifice was so incredibly meaningful. Additionally, I think there is a real order between the Father and the Son, without the Son being a lesser being. The whole concept of the Eternal Generation. The Father sends, and the Son is sent. Like when Acts 1:7 says the Father fixed the times and the seasons by his own authority, I see it more as it's the Father's prerogative, and that's really how the bridegroom analogy makes sense to me, even if I wouldn't build my entire argument on that specifically. So overall, I'd say there is an order without an inequality. The Son is fully God; He is Yahweh of the Old Testament, but when He became man, He really accepted human limitations, not only physical limitations but also limitations in growth in knowledge. That is how I can best reconcile the passages together, personally. That also makes everything He did for us just that much more beautiful and incredible.