Thank you, this is exactly the kind of question I was hoping people would ask. Pods is much closer to a shared accountability and execution space than a traditional project management tool. It does not replace GitHub, Linear, or Notion, and it currently does not have native video meeting rooms. Instead, each Pod has a shared room where members can chat, post progress, react, reply, and follow what everyone is shipping. A typical flow looks like this. A creator opens a Pod, defines the goal, schedule, daily expectations, what counts as proof, and the Testnet NIM commitment. Members join the Pod and lock their Testnet NIM commitment upfront. Before each deadline, every member locks a specific task, such as "finish the funding screen" or "deploy the new landing page." Once the work is complete, they submit proof and the creator reviews it. For a Build & Ship Pod, proof could be a GitHub commit or PR, a live deployment, a demo, a screenshot, or a short explanation of what changed. Public artifacts can be shared with the group, while sensitive evidence can remain visible only to the reviewer. Over time, the Pod becomes a visible record of what the team committed to and what they actually shipped. For Pods in Pods, we are following this exact process. We lock the next piece of work, build it, submit the relevant commit, screenshot, or deployment, and share the result in the room. The Testnet NIM commitment makes that promise feel more deliberate, while the shared room gives the team a place to support one another and build in public. Meeting and community event support is one possible direction from here. Pods could eventually help communities organize build calls, workshops, or check-ins by sharing meeting links, tracking attendance, publishing notes, and turning discussions into new commitments. That said, I do not want to assume this is the right direction before people actually use the product. I built Pods to solve my own consistency problem. From here, I want it to evolve around what this community and other builders actually need instead of my assumptions. If people discover a better direction or a more valuable use case, I want Pods to grow into that.