I need people to check https://www.johnmarshall.edu on mobile phones and tablet (in both horizontal and vertical mode) let me know if teh site breaks in anyway please let me know in the comments what device you viewed it on and how it worked. I really need it review of droids as I don't own one. Thanks in advance... p.s. if it does break screencaps and/or error messages would be extremely helpful

Every agency owner has a tool stack. Most of us also have a tool graveyard. We just don’t talk about that one. You signed up for the free trial. It rolled into a paid plan. Then life got busy and you never logged in again. That’s not a discipline problem. That’s the business model. Free trials are built to renew quietly, and every guru with an affiliate link is selling you one more login. Here’s the math. $49 a month doesn’t sound like much. It’s $588 a year. Stack three of those and you’re at $1,764 for software you never open. Now ask how many hours of client work it takes to clear that. Nobody posts this part. The feed is full of “here’s my stack” screenshots. Nobody screenshots the cancel page. So I want to break that pattern today. Not “I should probably audit my subscriptions.” Open your card statement and name one. What tool are you paying for right now and not using? Name it and the monthly price.

https://www.news.com.au/technology/innovation/anthropic-ai-agent-gives-fake-murder-tip-to-us-cops-in-global-breach-australia-notified/news-story/6048aa2b1c97b794028c14b104347505

A client reached out to me and wants me to be the adminstrator of their website after firing their other guy. I really don't want to get in over my head. Exspecially with the possibility of emergency support. 8 hours timezone difference combined with my travel schedule leads to slow response time. I can do backups, updates, form check, minor tech fixes, performance edits, and I think put software in place for uptime monitoring. The emergency call saying my website i down is what scares the shit out of me. @Dorn Just Dorn you posted something recently about this, having layers. what was that post? I also need to start recruiting and i'll be working on 𝗕𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮 𝗧𝗲𝗮𝗺 𝗕𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗬𝗼𝘂 𝗔𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝗡𝗲𝗲𝗱 𝗢𝗻𝗲 next.

- Google updated its AI content guidance with a warning about hallucinations. - It says manually fact-checking all AI-generated content before publishing is critical. - The review step also applies to titles, meta descriptions, structured data, and alt text. Google's guidance on AI-generated content now says to fact-check it by hand before publishing, and the review extends to titles, alt text, and other metadata. Google has updated its guidance for sites that use generative AI, adding a warning that AI output may contain errors and advice to fact-check it by hand before publishing. Google revised the guidance page on Oct. 1. Its documentation updates page says the change brings the guide in line with the company’s talks at developer events. The page now extends the manual review to metadata, so teams using AI to write titles or image alt text are covered too. What Google Added Google’s new wording goes in the guidance page’s “Focus on accuracy, quality, and relevance” section, right after the section’s opening line. Compared with the Dec. 10, 2025, version, three sentences were added: “Keep in mind that generative models don’t retrieve facts, but predict a likely sequence of words based on their training data. Because of this, generative AI outputs may contain inaccuracies (also known as hallucinations). It is critical to manually factcheck and review all AI-generated content for accuracy and trustworthiness before publishing.” https://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-fact-check-ai-content-before-publishing/591782