Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

Mandarin Blueprint Lite

26k members • Free

CantoLingo

21 members • Free

Toaldo Violin School

110 members • Free

Tai Chi⚡️Players Club

25 members • Free

The Grove Kung Fu

71 members • Free

HighKickMobility's School

280 members • Free

Warrior Kickboxing Academy

41 members • Free

How to Taekwondo

1k members • Free

3 contributions to Physics/Cosmology/Spirituality
“Why is angular momentum eternal”
@Tim Van Thanks for joining the group, Tim, and for your great question — it’s one of the most important questions in human history, because once people understand the eternal nature of angular momentum and see the fact that angular momentum is everywhere in nature, they will understand all physical phenomena in the universe: no more fabricated mysteries. Angular momentum is eternal because angular momentum conserves — energy conserves. There’s no other option because energy is the only entity that exists: wherever it is, it’s there, it can’t disappear into any other “place” because it’s the very definition of “place” itself. An intimately related principle is “there’s no nothingness”. Angular momentum being angular momentum, it just means rotational energy rotates eternally. From the elementary particles of electrons and positrons to the atoms and molecules to the astronomical bodies and to the entire universe itself, everything spins and rotates like a locked gear and all activities are happening according to the law of the conservation of angular momentum. In the Nicene Creed, the theologians talked about god begets god, or from god comes god. If you remove the theological bullshit and only retain the underlying logic, you would get “rotation begets rotation”. Thanks again and look forward to more discussions.
1 like • 1d
@Xiang He Intriguing. Is that to imply rotation through another spatial dimension? Like you say, there'd still be an axis, but it may not look like a straight line in meatspace, or even a coherent shape.
1 like • 23h
@Xiang He Totally agree with the mismatch between mathematical dimensions and observable reality. Do you have a favorite internet resource regarding this hierarchy? Among other things, I don't have a telescope. Haha
“What are Fermions made of?”
@Aaron Conrad Hi Aaron, thanks for joining the group and for your question. I hope the fact that you are asking such a question indicates you don’t necessarily buy what’s contained in the Wikipedia entry on fermions. The answer is very simple: any and all matter necessarily consists of the two fundamental charges only, namely the electron and the positron. In other words, there’s only one type of “fermion” — electron and positron — the rest are all composite particles, ie no quarks whatsoever. The classification of fermions and bosons is wrong, revealing lack of understanding of the nature of matter. The only valid classification is that of matter and radiation. For matter, only electrons and positrons exist; for radiation, only photons and photinos exist, no gluons whatsoever, and the neutrino is a misnomer — its real identity is photino. The logical explanation can be expressed as the “ontological exclusion principle” — something today’s physicists have never heard of. We can discuss this further in follow up chats. Thanks again!
1 like • 3d
@Xiang He I could be willing to believe that theology is imagination but I believe religion, as a construct, is an amoral double-edged sword. Perhaps we'll get to chat on these things in detail. This week is busy for me, but I'm very interested.
1 like • 1d
@Xiang He It so happens that I recently became acquainted with on of Ernest Sternglass's relatives, who is not 'in physics.' I call that syncronicity. I'll be learning more about the β-e model which, I'll bother to point out, was not abandoned for 'no good reason.'
“What made you use the number 1024”
@Charles Martin Thanks for joining the group, Charles. In the “about” page, a reference is added to indicate the significance of this number. Essentially, when the universe is at its minimum size consisting of a pair of relativistically rotating electron and positron with enormous relativistic mass, it undergoes ten successive divisions to have 1024 pairs of electron and positron before having to inflate exponentially for the first time to accommodate the next ten divisions. Each pair then undergoes further divisions and inflations until the protons are formed at the last stage and the Big Bang takes place. In other words, the 1024 supercomolexes are the largest rotating systems internal to the universe that’s also rotating/precessing as a whole. This structure should be discernible in the CMB with high enough resolution. This community-building process here in Skool from just one member to hopefully millions reminds me of the cosmic process, hence this number. Thanks again and look forward to discussing in more details.
1 like • 3d
Howdy, Mr. He. If I understand this, you're suggesting that SPECIFICALLY ten doublings, meaning 512 complementary pairs, should be discernible in the CMBR. Is there something special about the eleventh division that makes it less important, or at least less visible? β-e interactions, of course, are not the same as the high-density scenarios like in neutron stars.
1 like • 3d
@Xiang He Ahh, right: We don't start with the one (neiji), we start with a pair (taiji) from which all things are derived. I'm not sure I understand what you mean, referring to the original space filling up. If there was only a single pair initially, the space they occupied would be entirely unlike the space(time) we're in, now. Even still, wouldn't 512 pairs take up more space than a single pair? This is very curious to me, and I like where this discussion is going. I apologize if I come across as aloof. I tend to be a little terse typing, but that's more of an optimization problem than intending any disrespect.
1-3 of 3
Aaron Conrad
2
12points to level up
@aaron-conrad-9391
Studying to be a physicist and training to be a Starfleet captain

Active 50m ago
Joined Dec 9, 2025