I'm kicking off a weekly live Q&A on YouTube, and you set the agenda. How it works: - Drop any question you've got by texting the number below — business, content, mindset, whatever you're actually stuck on. - Each week I pull the best ones and answer them LIVE on a YouTube stream. - The replay gets posted after, so you can rewatch anytime. Ask me your question here: https://app.tryprojectblue.com/inbound-lead-form/79f716a4-2df2-40cf-b48f-776a27db8fc7 👍 Like the questions you most want answered — I'll prioritize the ones with the most votes. No question is too basic or too big. If you're wondering it, someone else in here is too. 🎥 This week's live: [Thursday/Friday] Comment your questions below 👇 The more specific, the better the answer you'll get.

Is anyone here experienced with Make.com Instagram automations?

Personalization used to mean scraping a name and company from LinkedIn, dropping it in the first line, and hitting send. "Hey {FirstName}, I noticed {Company} and thought..." That worked in 2022. It's dead now. Everyone's doing it and prospects can spot a mail merge from the subject line. What changed for me was treating personalization like actual research instead of a data field. Here's what I started doing: → I scrape the prospect's entire website. Not just the homepage. Blog posts, service pages, case studies, about page, even their contact form if it's there. → Then I feed all of that into OpenAI and have it analyze what they actually do, who they serve, and what problems they're likely dealing with. The AI doesn't just summarize. It finds the specific details nobody mentions in generic outreach. So instead of "I saw you work in logistics," the email opens with "Noticed you handle cross border freight into Mexico. Your blog mentioned customs delays eating 15% of delivery windows." That's the kind of line that gets opened because it doesn't sound like 500 other emails they got that week. The reply rates went from 2-3% with generic personalization to 8-10% with actual research. One prospect replied last week: "Your email won because you actually read our site. Everyone else sent the same template." The system I built does this automatically. Scrapes the website. Analyzes every page. Generates icebreakers that reference non-obvious details. It writes openers like a human who spent 20 minutes studying their business, except it does it for 1,000 prospects in an hour. Here's what I learned building this: Small prompt details make a massive difference. Having OpenAI shorten company names naturally (say "Stripe" not "Stripe Inc.") and reference specific pages beyond the homepage makes it feel real. The difference between "I saw your website" and "I saw your freight tracking dashboard lets customers get ETAs without calling" is everything. One feels like spam. The other feels like someone did their homework.

Hey everyone 👋 I’ve been diving deep into AI systems recently, especially around how LLM apps are built and scaled. One thing I keep noticing:Most people don’t really know where their AI costs are going. Things like: - token usage - retry loops - inefficient prompts They quietly increase costs without being obvious. Lately, I’ve been exploring ways to track and understand this better while building AI solutions. Curious — how are you all tracking your AI usage and costs right now?

Greetings, i trust you are well. i need to know, with openclaw available, can it be set up to build and repair agents without you physically doing it through agent builders?