I am Ruben Plasmeijer, from the Netherlands, working on CLUES (Curiosity in Life, to Understand, Evolve, and Succeed) with a lovely group of people here on Skool! Currently not offering anything in specific, focusing on community first(!), but we are soon going to focus on Private support, and online courses. So that basically means that we are now sort of stuck at the monetization part of it, but that's "on purpose" for a big part of it! The dream result for the next 90 days is to build a incredibly engaged community with +200 members, providing lots of value as a community and in person to a smaller group of people.🙏

If someone was considering a premium or paid AI model to use, what would be your recommendation? I hear each one is different or better suited for different things but I don't have the slightest clue really on what that would be

If you’ve ever thought: “This AI stuff is overrated—the answers I get are so generic” … chances are it’s not the AI. It’s the prompt. 👉 Garbage In = Garbage Out (GIGO). The good news: you can fix it. Here’s the CRISP Framework (credit: 100 School 🙌) to level up your prompts: C – Context → Give AI the business situation + constraints so it stays relevant. R – Role → Assign it a persona (ex: senior copywriter, marketing strategist, RN with 10 yrs experience). I – Instruction → Break down what to create, why it matters, must-haves, and success criteria. S – Specification → Define format, tone, structure (ex: 3-paragraph email, bullet points, casual tone). P – Performance → Set metrics/standards that separate “meh” from exceptional (ex: include stats, stay under 250 words, 5th grade reading level). 👉 Example: ❌ “Write me a social post.” ✅ “Act as a marketing strategist. Write me a LinkedIn post (150 words) for insurance agents about the risk of DIY retirement plans, using a casual but expert tone, ending with a call to book a consult.” The second one gets you gold every time. 🏆 👉 Question for you: Where do you feel ChatGPT gives you the most “garbage” right now—emails, posts, or lead follow-ups? Drop it below 👇 and let’s fix it using CRISP.

Ever go back-and-forth with ChatGPT, adding more and more clarifications… until the poor thing is confused and your output is worse than where you started? 🙃 There’s a smarter way: the Prompt Edit technique Here’s how it works: 1️⃣ Write your first (basic) prompt. Example: “Write a short summary of our new product feature.” 2️⃣ Run it. Look at the output. Meh. 3️⃣ Instead of explaining in the thread → go back, click 📝 (pencil icon), Edit message, and refine the original prompt: “Write a short summary of our new product feature for our Q4 launch deck. Audience is internal, non-technical stakeholders. Tone: clear and confident.” 4️⃣ Run it again. Notice how the output is sharper, cleaner, and more on target. 💡 When to use Prompt Edit: ✔️ Trying different prompt styles ✔️ Experimenting with tone ✔️ Refining an output for side-by-side comparisons ✔️ Testing the difference between garbage vs. CRISP prompts (👀 looking at you, GIGO 😅) Credit: 100 School 🙌.