A question came in last night that I think a lot of you are wondering too š
"I only just found the community ā the system mentions starting 3 months out. Is it still worth setting up now?" Yes. Absolutely. Here's the honest answer. The 3-month timeline is ideal. But the system itself isn't time-dependent ā the feedback loop works whether you have 12 weeks or 6. I actually started running it myself during Easter of Year 13. The shorter the window, the more valuable each paper becomes, because you can't afford to waste sessions on the wrong things. What actually matters right now: Do the papers and process them properly Most students do a paper, check the answers, and move on. That's not revision ā that's just performance. The learning happens in the feedback. Mark it, identify every weak topic, drill those specific questions, log every mistake. That loop is what moves scores. Track your weak topics Keep a record of every question you get wrong and why. Go back and drill those exact questions plus similar ones. Students who plateau are usually revising what they already know. Students who improve are hunting their weaknesses. Flashcards every morning 15-30 minutes before anything else ā especially for content-heavy subjects. Do it regularly and recall gets noticeably easier within a week. Not instead of papers ā alongside them. Notes with the book closed, not open If you've been making notes on weak topics ā close everything first. Write what you remember, then check. That's active recall. Notes with the book open is just copying. Same time investment, completely different result! Six weeks is enough time to make a real difference if the system is running properly from tomorrow. Drop any questions in Ask Anything ā nothing is too simple. That's what it's there for!