27d • Publishing
Alternative publishing practices
If you’re waiting 12+ months for “the right” journal, you’re quietly tanking your visibility, impact and sanity.
Here’s a 5‑step publishing process from the attached Knowledge Exchange report you can implement this year – without blowing up your career:
1️⃣ Preprint everything (safely)
Post a preprint as soon as a manuscript is coherent. Then submit to your target journal in parallel. You get instant timestamps, citations and feedback, while still playing the conventional game.
2️⃣ Show your peer review trail
When given the option, choose transparent or open peer review and link those reports in your CV, website and grant applications. You’re no longer just “counting papers”; you’re evidencing rigour and responsiveness.
3️⃣ Preregister your next study
For your next project, preregister hypotheses + analysis plan before data collection. In fields where it’s standard, you gain trust; in others, you instantly differentiate your work on quality, not journal logo.
4️⃣ Treat papers as versions, not monuments
Use preprints or repositories to post corrected and updated versions. Own your errors publicly and you signal integrity; hiding them is what actually damages reputation long‑term.
5️⃣ Start modular, low‑risk
You don’t need to “move to Octopus” overnight. Begin by sharing one extra module per project: detailed methods, datasets or negative results in an open repository or modular platform.
If you implement just steps 1–2 in the next 6 months, your “publishing strategy” stops being:
“Hope reviewers are kind and editors are fast”
…and starts being:
“Make my work visible, citable and obviously rigorous – before the journal decides my fate.”
6
5 comments
Alternative publishing practices
powered by
skool.com/research-career-club-8446
Become 'go-to' research expert by delivering novel research; engaging outside academia; and building profile to amplify impact | Created by Prof Hanak
Suggested communities
Powered by