5d • General discussion
Is Aikido Complete Without Mi-ai?
In my many years of experience doing Aikido, I've come to understand, Aikido, at its core, is an art of self-protection. If your intent is to attack, you’ve already moved away from its spirit.
But here’s the question…
If your opponent does not respect your ability to strike—what keeps them from countering or bypassing your Mi-ai at every turn?
To practice and understand Aikido honestly, you must look to keep your opponent off balance—physically and mentally.
That means being able to move forward, as easily as backward, up as naturally as down, left as freely as right.
Unsoku and Atemi waza are not about harm or movement alone, they're about presence, pressure, and possibility. like the Jab and the side kick.
If there is no threat, there is no reaction or action. If there is no action or reaction from mi-ai, there is no Aikido. This is why aikido techniques should always start from Mi-ai, have an entry, a technique, and then a finish or escape. I feel to only look at the technique without the set up, or return to safety falls extremely short of the teachings of Aikido. For those who practiced grappling and are looking to understand aikido, practice and maintain ma-ai, look for the entries that flows to techniques, and then the technique that flows to a finish or escape. What are your thoughts?
1
1 comment
Is Aikido Complete Without Mi-ai?
powered by
skool.com/practical-aikido-tomiki-method-8968
Tomiki Aikido practice focused on calm control under pressure. Competition as feedback, responsibility over ego, budo in action.
Suggested communities
Powered by