🚦Blame vs. Accountability – Shaping Safer, Stronger Teams
In operations, the facts and outcomes may be the same in any organization — but the culture you foster determines whether those outcomes are sustained, improved, or repeated.
Mindsets That Shape Culture
🔴 Culture of Blame
  • People are the problem
  • Fault-finding & finger-pointing
  • Mistakes hidden out of fear
  • Focus on the past and punishment
  • Risk-averse, “wait until told” behaviour
🟢 Culture of Accountability
  • People are problem-solvers
  • Fact-finding to understand what happened
  • Mistakes surfaced for learning
  • Focus on the future and solutions
  • Calculated risk-taking and initiative
☆Examples in Power Engineering
  • Reporting a process variable setpoint error instead of silently adjusting around it.
  • Leaving a control loop in manual after start-up and forgetting to return it to auto — not hidden, but reviewed and corrected so it doesn’t repeat.
  • Suppressing an alarm rather than addressing the root rationalization issue — which can delay response to an upset or optimization opportunity.
☆Each of these moments can become either a learning opportunity or a blame trap. The difference? Culture.
☆Why This Matters
Our regulatory frameworks (e.g., ABSA Safety Codes Act, OH&S Code, CSA standards, AER directives) all hinge on one thing: human behaviour in real time.
☆If the environment encourages hiding or deflecting, risks multiply. If the environment supports reporting, reflection, and coaching, hazards are contained and systems optimized.
☆A Note on Stigma
Men and women may experience the risk of speaking up differently.
  • Men often face stigma around vulnerability, “not knowing,” or admitting error.
  • Women often face stigma around being “too assertive” or “overcautious.” Both stigmas are dangerous in high-consequence environments. Leaders must dismantle these barriers so that every operator feels safe to voice a concern or admit an oversight.
Accountability Framework (Post-Investigation)
1️⃣ Exceptional Behaviour → Recognize & reward.
2️⃣ Expected Behaviour → Encourage & acknowledge.
3️⃣ Unintentional Mistake → Coach & train.
4️⃣ Situational Adaptation → Coach on risk communication.
5️⃣ Optimization for Benefit → Coach on balancing speed & standards.
6️⃣ Personal Gain Violation → Discipline per policy.
7️⃣ Reckless Violation → Discipline per policy.
Supervisors follow the same ladder, with emphasis on reward, coaching, and fair discipline.
☆The Leadership Call-to-Action
✅ Remove fear from the feedback loop
✅ Focus on “what” happened, not “who” to blame
✅ Recognize that blameless ≠ unaccountable
✅ Promote psychological safety so every voice is heard
✅ Apply policies and codes consistently, regardless of role or gender
💬 Question for you:Have you ever caught yourself suppressing an alarm or leaving a loop in manual “just to get through the shift”? What’s the better cultural response when that happens?
#Leadership #SafetyCulture #PowerEngineering #Accountability #OH&S #ABSA #AER #ProcessSafety #OperationsExcellence
4
3 comments
Carrmen Kirsh
5
🚦Blame vs. Accountability – Shaping Safer, Stronger Teams
Power Engineering 101
skool.com/power-engineering
Our mission is to empower every Power Engineer by helping them pass their SOPEEC exams to achieve the certification they desire.
Leaderboard (30-day)
Powered by