🔥
11d (edited) • General discussion
The Quality of Research Companies 😬
The quality of research companies — especially these newer ones — is going downhill fast. I wanted to give you guys some insight into what running PeptidePrice.store actually looks like behind the scenes.
In the past 7 days alone, I reviewed 48 different research companies:
• 45 of them were missing COAs on one or more products if they had any at all
• 2 had Photoshopped COAs — which I caught by verifying them directly
• Only 1 company met the standards for the price tool
Read that again. One out of forty-eight.
With all these brand new peptide companies popping up left and right, there are even companies out there offering white-labeling services for new startups. That means someone with zero experience and zero testing can slap a label on a product and start selling it tomorrow.
Be very careful with who you're trusting in this industry. People think they can get away with a lot — and honestly, most of them are getting away with it because nobody's checking.
I'm checking.
And yes, I will keep doing quality checks on the vendors we currently have on the site. That's not changing. Fresh Tests. Real Standards. No Compromises.
100
55 comments
The Quality of Research Companies 😬
powered by
skool.com/peptide-price-9771
Premier peptide education hub. FREE courses on research peptides & GLP-1s. US supplier intel, safety protocols & expert community support. 🧬🚀
Suggested communities
Powered by