17d • 🤝 Trade Reviews & Q&A
META — Follow-Up on Nov 25 Analysis (Context Matters)
This is a follow-up to the META analysis I posted on Nov 25:https://www.skool.com/nochase-swing-watchlist-2326/meta-bullish-bias-2?p=f6b8e951
At the time, the bias was HTF bullish, but the plan was very specific:
- I was not interested in chasing strength
- My focus was on deeper pullbacks into monthly demand (558–570 / ~550 pivot)
- Risk was clearly defined if that demand failed
What’s important to note is this:
Price never retraced deep enough into my ideal zone to justify aggressive accumulation.
Instead, META based higher and expanded without offering the “perfect” entry.
From that post to today, META is now up ~20-25%.
This isn’t an example of prediction.
Its' an example of process.
Sometimes price gives you the entry.
Sometimes it just leaves.
In both cases, the job is the same:
- Define levels in advance
- Accept what price gives (or doesn’t give)
- Don’t rewrite rules after the fact
Ironically, that post ended up marking the low — not because it was called, but because higher-timeframe structure was already doing the work.
Same framework.
Same patience.
Letting the market decide.
0
0 comments
META — Follow-Up on Nov 25 Analysis (Context Matters)
powered by
skool.com/nochase-swing-watchlist-2326
Free swing‑trading school for 9–5 pros who want clear levels, rules, and less screen time using the No‑Chase Swing Method.
Suggested communities
Powered by