4d • General discussion
Sending communications to Chester County School
For transparency, not response
I’m sharing two letters I previously sent to the Superintendent and Board of Directors.
These are not shared to solicit engagement, debate, or action. No response is expected or required.
They are offered simply as part of my own record-keeping and commitment to communicate clearly, respectfully, and in good faith.
Read or don’t—either is fine.
— Ryan
Letter Sent 1/29/2026 to the Superintendent:
Superintendent Dr. Colletti,
I am writing with care and deliberation.
Throughout the past several years, in matters involving law enforcement, school governance, counsel, courts, and administrative agencies, I have sought to conduct myself consistently — with restraint, clarity, and respect for process — even when doing so carried significant personal cost. I have not always succeeded perfectly, but my intent has remained steady: to pursue truth without malice and resolution without unnecessary harm. I understand that Superintendent Dutkiewicz does not maintain a public-facing email address, and I am therefore directing this correspondence through your office consistent with prior communications.
As my remaining Right-to-Know requests approach their natural conclusion, I believe it is appropriate to request a meeting to discuss clarification of outstanding issues and to determine whether there is a reasonable path toward resolution before additional institutional or administrative burdens accumulate.
I want to acknowledge directly that I understand how difficult it can be for institutions to address matters once they have taken on complexity, risk, and reputational weight. I do not approach this lightly, nor with a desire to impose pressure or extract outcomes. At the same time, the impact of what occurred was real — not only to me and my family, but also to others who objected, spoke, or were affected despite seeking no conflict themselves. Those costs cannot be reduced to abstractions.
One practical consideration affecting timing is the need for clear confirmation that I may be present on District property for such a meeting without risk of detention or enforcement action. As you are aware, prior restrictions and related ambiguity have required me to proceed cautiously. Once that issue is resolved and I have confirmation of access, I would be prepared to meet in person.
With that in mind, I am writing now to make the request in advance. If access to District property is confirmed by February 6, 2026, I would be available to meet either prior to, or following, the District’s regularly scheduled Board meeting on that date, or at another mutually convenient time.
If you are amenable, I would propose a meeting including the Superintendent, District Solicitor, myself, and my ADA aid and encourager. I am not represented by counsel in making this request and would intend the discussion to be open, respectful, and on the record.
For scheduling purposes, I would appreciate a brief acknowledgment within five (5) business days indicating whether this arrangement is acceptable or proposing an alternative date and time. If I do not hear back by the end of business on February 6, 2026, I will assume that the District does not wish to pursue a meeting at this time and will plan accordingly.
Whether or not you choose to engage is, of course, your decision. My intent in writing is simply to make space for clarity and possible resolution before paths narrow further, and to do so in a manner consistent with how I have sought to walk this entire process.
Respectfully,
John Ryan Miller
Sent 2/9/2026 To the Octorara School District Board
Dear Octorara School Board Director
I am writing briefly and respectfully to provide you with a copy of correspondence I sent to the Superintendent on January 29, 2026, which is attached for your awareness.
I am not seeking action, deliberation, or response from you individually or collectively. No reply is necessary, and none is expected. My intent in sharing this is simply to ensure transparency and completeness in the record, particularly as my remaining Right-to-Know requests approach their conclusion.
Throughout this process, I have sought to proceed with restraint, clarity, and respect for institutional roles, even where doing so carried personal cost. Sharing this correspondence with you is consistent with that posture. It is offered in good faith and without demand.
Whether or not the District chooses to engage further is, of course, its prerogative. My purpose here is limited: to ensure that those entrusted with governance are aware of the communication and the tone in which it was made.
Thank you for your time and for your service.
Respectfully,
Ryan MillerCultural Contrarian
0
0 comments
Sending communications to Chester County School
