Working with one of my Legal Forensic Nurse students and she asked this...

Best question ever!!!! This is one of the most common areas of confusion when nurses are new to legal forensic nursing.

Many nurses are used to thinking like neutral clinicians, which is important in healthcare. But when you are hired behind the scenes by an attorney, you are not being hired as the neutral expert witness for both sides.

You are being hired as part of one side’s litigation support team.

That means your job is not just to list facts.

Your job is to help the attorney understand what the records show, where the weaknesses are, where the strengths are, what the defense may argue, and what support exists to strengthen the case.

In this example, the student is working on a personal injury dog bite case.

The plaintiff was bitten by a dog and later reported symptoms involving his fingers, including numbness. However, the records also show that he has a history of diabetes.

This matters because diabetes can sometimes be associated with numbness or nerve-related symptoms.

So from a nursing perspective, the student correctly recognized that diabetes could be relevant, and was going to leave it at that in her report and opinion.

But in a legal case, we have to think beyond the medical fact alone.

The defense attorney may try to argue:

“The numbness was not caused by the dog bite. He already had diabetes, and that is why his fingers were numb.”

That is why the diabetes matters. It may become a defense argument.

But the deeper question is:

Did the dog bite cause a new problem, or did it make an existing problem worse?

Was his numbness documented before the dog bite?

Did it become worse after the dog bite?

Did the symptoms involve the same hand or fingers that were injured?

Did the records show a change in pain, sensation, function, treatment, or complaints after the bite?

Did any provider connect the numbness or nerve symptoms to the dog bite injury?

This is the part where we see nurses flop.

A basic report by a legal nurse says, “Patient has diabetes and reports numbness.”

A legal forensic nurse asks, “How does this fact affect the case, how might the defense use it, and what do the records show that may support the plaintiff attorney’s argument?”

That is where your value begins <--------- Here is my answer to her question for more explanation

Hi love! because this is such a difficult concept to grasp for so many people that are new to the field, and even a lot of "experienced legal nurses and experts..."

Hi! I love this question so much and it is also one of the biggest things new legal nurses misunderstand in the beginning.

You are correct in noticing that his history of diabetes could matter.

But here is the part I really want you to understand:

You were not hired as the neutral expert witness, you were hired as a behind-the-scenes consultant for one side.

That means your job is not to write a middle-of-the-road report that simply says:

“His fingers may be numb from diabetes.”

That may be medically true, but it does not help the plaintiff attorney understand how to fight for their client.

You alert the attorney that the defense is going to say [we call this a red flag]:

“His fingers were numb because of diabetes, not because of the dog bite.”

That is the attack.

Your job is to help the attorney prepare for that attack.

So instead of stopping at:

“He has diabetes, and diabetes can cause numbness,”

you need to dig deeper and ask:

What changed after the dog bite?

Did the records show his numbness got worse after the injury?

Did he have finger numbness before the bite, but then after the bite it became more painful, more frequent, or more limiting?

Did the bite affect the same hand or fingers?

Did his complaints increase after the incident?

Did he need more treatment after the bite?

Did the records show a new injury, infection, nerve concern, wound issue, or functional limitation after the bite?

Did the provider connect any of his symptoms to the dog bite?

That is the difference between simply copying medical facts and actually analyzing the case.

A regular summary says:

“Patient has diabetes. Patient reports numbness.”

A legal forensic nurse asks:

“Did this dog bite make an already-existing problem worse, and where is that supported in the records?”

That is the skill.

That is the value.

That is what attorneys need from you.

You are not there to ignore the diabetes. You absolutely need to flag it because it is a red flag. But you also need to explain why it matters to the attorney.

For example:

“The patient has a history of diabetes, which may be used by the defense to argue that the finger numbness was pre-existing or unrelated to the dog bite. However, the records should be reviewed for any documentation showing whether the numbness worsened after the bite, changed in severity, involved the injured area, required additional treatment, or was connected by a provider to the dog bite injury.”

That is a much stronger way to present it.

You are still being honest.

You are still using the records.

You are still staying in your lane.

But now you are helping the attorney understand the problem and prepare for it.

This is where so many legal nurses get confused.

If you were hired as an expert witness, your role would be more neutral. You would give your opinion independently and objectively, whether it helps or hurts the case.

But when you are hired behind the scenes as a consultant for the plaintiff attorney, you are part of that attorney’s litigation team. You are helping them understand the medical records, identify weaknesses, find strengths, and prepare their case.

You are not writing for both sides.

You are not writing a report for the defense attorney.

You are not simply listing facts and leaving the attorney with nothing to work with.

You are helping the attorney answer the bigger question:

How do we prove this injury caused harm or made his condition worse?

That is the mindset shift.

Legal forensic nursing is not just:

“Here is what the chart says.”

It is:

“Here is what the chart says, here is why it matters, here is how the other side may attack it, and here is what we need to look for to strengthen the case.”

That is what makes your work valuable.

That is also why attorneys do not keep hiring nurses who only copy and paste facts from the record.

Attorneys need analysis. They need strategy. They need someone who understands the medical story and can help them see what matters.

So yes, diabetes is important.

But do not stop there.

Ask yourself:

Did the dog bite make something worse?Can I prove that from the records?What will the defense argue?What does the plaintiff attorney need to know so they are prepared?

That is the work.

And what is so incredible about you asking this question is that you just identified the exact moment so many legal nurses miss.

This is where the shift happens.

Most nurses stop at, “What does the record say?”

But a legal forensic nurse goes deeper and asks, “What does this mean for the case, how will the other side use it, and what can we find in the records to support or defend the argument?”

That is the part so many nurses are never taught. They are handed records, told to summarize them, and then left alone to figure out why the attorney never calls back.

But you are starting to see it.

You are seeing the value of looking through a forensic lens.

You are seeing why this work is not just about copying facts from a chart.

It is about strategy. It is about case strength. It is about understanding the medical story in a way that actually helps the attorney move the case forward.

And that is why becoming a Certified Legal Forensic Nurse is an elevation beyond traditional legal nurse consulting.

I am so proud of you!

0 comments