DEIB vs MEEA
DEIB vs. MEEA: What Are We Actually Building?
I’ve been playing with the idea that maybe the opposite of belonging isn’t simply exclusion.
Maybe it’s acceptance.
Because acceptance can sound wonderful—and sometimes it is. But acceptance can also be conditional:
You can be here.
You can participate.
We accept you.
…as long as you can function within what already exists.
Belonging asks something different.
Can you be here without becoming more like us?
Can your needs change how the space operates?
Can your perspective influence decisions?
Do you have access to power, resources, and repair?
Does the community change because you are part of it?
That got me thinking about DEIB as a set of relationships rather than a collection of buzzwords:
Diversity ↔ Monoculture
Equity ↔ Exploitation / Theft
Inclusion ↔ Exclusion
Belonging ↔ Acceptance
And once I started mapping those, more appeared:
Invitation ↔ Assimilation
Access ↔ Gatekeeping
Shared Power ↔ Power Hoarding
Voice ↔ Silencing
Representation ↔ Erasure
Reciprocity ↔ Extraction
Accommodation ↔ Conformity
Pluralism ↔ Normativity
Interdependence ↔ Domination
Repair ↔ Preservation of Harm
Accountability ↔ Impunity
Justice ↔ Injustice
Liberation ↔ Oppression
Community Care ↔ Individualism
I’m calling the second framework MEEA: Monoculture, Exploitation, Exclusion, Acceptance.
Not because every instance of acceptance is harmful, or because these words are all perfect dictionary antonyms. They aren't.
I’m interested in what happens when we look at them structurally.
A space can be diverse while still expecting assimilation.
It can include people while withholding power.
It can represent people while extracting from them.
It can accommodate difference while treating the dominant culture as the default.
It can even accept people without ever allowing their presence to transform the institution.
So perhaps the question isn't simply:
“Are people welcome here?”
Maybe it's:
“What are people required to give up in order to be welcome here?”
Because acceptance often says, “You may enter.”
Belonging says, “This is yours, too.”
And those are not the same thing.
For this framework, I’m using “belonging” as generally unconditional and “acceptance” as usually conditional, not as universal definitions, but as a way of examining the difference between being permitted into an existing system and having the power to participate in shaping it.
Deconstructing with Aleeza
0
0 comments
Aleeza McCant
5
DEIB vs MEEA
powered by
Deconstructing with Aleeza
skool.com/deconstructing-theater-1925
We're deconstructing white supremacy, antiblackness, race, and racism in theater and our daily lives.
Build your own community
Bring people together around your passion and get paid.
Powered by