πŸ“ˆ CJC-1295: Pulse vs Prolonged Signaling
CJC-1295 exists in two commonly discussed forms:
β€’ No DAC – shorter half-life, more pulsatile GH signaling
β€’ DAC – extended half-life, sustained GH elevation
From a research standpoint, this changes:
β€’ Feedback loop dynamics
β€’ IGF-1 exposure timing
β€’ Recovery vs adaptation emphasis
❓ Question: If you were designing a research protocol, would you prefer pulsed signaling or continuous elevation β€” and what outcome would you be optimizing for?
1
0 comments
Brian Duclos
3
πŸ“ˆ CJC-1295: Pulse vs Prolonged Signaling
DadBod2Fit - SARM and Peptide
skool.com/dadbod2fit
The Full Continuation of the Deleted DadBod 2.0 YouTube Channel
Protocols, Pricing Tools, Q&A, and 2 Free Ebooks β€” All in One Place
Leaderboard (30-day)
Powered by