this isnt new tech.
but sometimes it helps hearing it a different way.
I'll outline the method and provide the prompt, but learning that these parts of a prompt exist is where your leverage is.
But knowings only half the battle.
## the tech
[!note] this is literally just a recap of jake's video:
---
**Here's the play**
1. Boot-up collaborative dashboard agent with voice chat.
2. Go into plan mode (below)
3. Explain overarching idea and scope, outline your intent, define what success looks like. Take your time. before you send this tell your agent to ask you 3 questions to make sure that you're both mentally in line before proceeding. If you detect drift this early, you kill it now.
4. Break each workflow down step by step to the agent, start with one this one is important.
5. buddy cook
**Boom your done.**
one workflow = one doc.
and you can put as many docs into a prompt as your lil heart imagines.
just keep extending the workflow. There a prompt attached, just save it in docs/ and @command it whenever you need a surface area touched/added. The entire thing isn't even necessary.
## the dossier
We all know the basic parts of the prompt.
identity, role, mental model, what done looks like, what not to do, context, output format yada yada yada.
but lets go over some that surfaced for me through ICM.
---
# **core directive**
you have to give lil homie what fuels him.
the prompt below gives him:
- the context architecture
- workflow stage design
- agent routing
- review gated workflow pipelines
- traceable failure correction
---
"Your job is to architect, audit, or refactor an ICM workspace into a high-performance, self-contained context system. The workspace must behave like a multi-stage content factory:
- Each stage transforms inputs into outputs.
- Each stage loads only the context required for its task.
- Stable rules live outside moving work.
- Human review gates exist at meaningful intervention points.
- Corrections to outputs are traced back to the rules, contracts, or routing decisions that caused the issue.
_You are not merely organizing files. You are designing a layered routing architecture where agents can work predictably, efficiently, and with semantic traceability._"
---
## Why this crushes
- It defines the job in terms the agent understands. _system terms_.
- It installs the factory model immediately.
- It frames context discipline as a hard operating rule.
- It makes traceability part of the mission.
- It prevents shallow workspace organiztion that looks clean but behaves badly.
### When to use
- have agents make quick otf adjustments in your workflows with /btw @plan @taskpacket. (all my examples are for pi harness)
---
# U-shaped discovery templates
## Template
"Before creating or heavily refactoring a workflow, identify the high-intervention points.
- Stage 1: Direction
- What is the starting input?
- What matters most at the beginning?
- What should not be decided by dnwonstream agents?
- Missle Stage: Execution
- Which rules must be enforced every time?
- Which decision can the agent make creatively?
- Which decision require your approval?
- Final Stage: Alignment
- What does "done" look like?
- Who reviews it?
- What must be true before the artifact moves forward?
## why this rules
- It gives planning an actual _shape_ instead of it being a flast list.
- It mirrors how good workflows _actually happen_: judgment early, constraints in the middle, judgment again at the end.
- Natural interview scaffold (defining the shape from point 1)
## when to use?
- with @plan and @architect
- spec interviews
---
This got too long too fast so I'm gonna end it, but there's plenty more to go over.
*we literally only got to two*
And if some of these things were already clicking with you when you heard it out loud were you able to find a name for it?
More importantly: are you noticing a pattern emerging from those 2 "parts" of the prompt in any way?