Honest question: where has AI actually helped your proposal process, and where has it let you down?
I want to get a real conversation going here, not a highlights reel.
We hear a lot about what AI is supposed to do for proposals. I want to know what it has actually done for yours, good and bad.
I will start.
Where it has genuinely helped us:
  • Compliance matrix generation from RFP documents saves 2 to 4 hours per proposal
  • First draft generation for boilerplate sections like firm overview and management approach cuts writing time significantly when given good source material
  • Rewriting for page limits: paste in a 600-word section with a 300-word limit and AI does a solid job
Where it has fallen short:
  • Anything requiring real agency-specific context. AI does not know that this particular county program officer cares deeply about local subcontractor participation.
  • Technical approach sections without strong human input. The drafts are generic and evaluators can tell.
  • Anything where the firm's voice and differentiation needs to come through. AI writes average. Winning proposals are not average.
Net verdict: AI as an accelerant is real. AI as a proposal writer is marketing.
What has your experience been? Drop your honest take below. No judgment here, just real data from real teams.
1
0 comments
Jennifer McPherson
1
Honest question: where has AI actually helped your proposal process, and where has it let you down?
AI for AEC proposals/pursuits
skool.com/chickenango-university-2358
It is 11pm. The RFP is due at 8am. This community exists so that never happens again. AI tools and pursuit strategy built for AEC proposal teams.
Powered by