A view to o1 · Burstiness and Perplexity

A view to o1

o1 is not designed as a chat model but as a high-level report generator that excels when provided with substantial context and well-defined goals. While initial interactions with o1 may feel clunky and unproductive, understanding its strengths—particularly in generating complex outputs and making decisions with comprehensive data—can unlock its full potential. The key lies in shifting from conversational prompting to providing detailed briefs, emphasizing clarity in objectives, and leveraging its autonomous reasoning capabilities.

Key Insights:

Provide Extensive Context: Treat o1 like a new hire; give detailed background, prior attempts, and relevant data.
Define Goals Clearly: Focus on what you want the output to be rather than instructing how it should be generated.
Play to Its Strengths:Excels in generating complete, error-free files.Provides robust explanations of complex topics.Hallucinates less compared to other models.
Adapt to Its Weaknesses:Struggles with style/voice-specific writing.Requires significant user input for larger, iterative tasks.
Optimize for Usability: Utilize tools like voice memos or pre-prepared context notes to streamline input processes.

Actionable FAQ for o1 Users

Q1: What is o1 designed for?

o1 is a report generator rather than a conversational chat model. It is ideal for tasks that require generating detailed, structured outputs with minimal iteration.

Q2: Why does o1 seem ineffective in chat-based scenarios?

Unlike traditional chat models, o1 does not actively pull context from the user. Instead, it requires you to provide all relevant details upfront, making it less effective for iterative, conversational workflows.

Q3: How can I make o1 work more effectively?

Write detailed briefs rather than simple prompts.
Include all relevant context, including failed attempts, database schemas, and specific business requirements.
Use tools like voice memos for context capture and transcription.

Q4: How do I optimize o1’s reasoning capabilities?

Specify the exact output you need, avoiding instructions on how to reach the solution.
Use the model’s autonomous reasoning to let it plan and execute steps independently.
Provide clear evaluation criteria for good vs. bad outputs to help the model self-correct.

Q5: What types of tasks is o1 particularly good at?

Generating error-free, complete files or sets of files.
Explaining technical or complex concepts in detail.
Diagnosing and providing detailed differentials for medical inquiries (as a secondary aid).

Q6: What tasks does o1 struggle with?

Writing in specific voices or non-academic styles.
Generating cohesive, multi-step solutions for large projects without user input.
Handling highly iterative or chat-based workflows effectively.

Q7: How can I manage o1’s latency issues?

o1 works best when viewed as a tool for high-latency tasks. For example:

Use it for generating complex deliverables or making architectural decisions.
Structure interactions to allow it to process detailed inputs over time.

Q8: How can developers leverage o1 in products?

Developers can design tools around o1 by focusing on:

Enhancing hierarchy and navigability in outputs (e.g., tables of contents, collapsible headers).
Improving context visualization within interfaces.
Building products that benefit from long-running, background intelligence tasks.

1 comment

Burstiness and Perplexity

skool.com/burstiness-and-perplexity

Master AI use cases from legal & the supply chain to digital marketing & SEO. Agents, analysis, content creation--Burstiness & Perplexity from NovCog

Leaderboard (30-day)