User
Write something
Pinned
📌 Where I've been, and why this community is changing
Ok this is a long one...I've been quiet for two months. No videos, not much here. I was traveling. That's the whole reason. I wasn't heads-down on a secret build and I'm not going to pretend otherwise. What I didn't expect was that stepping away would show me the problem with what I'd started here. Two months of distance and the gap was obvious. I've been telling you this place is about building AI systems that make money. Too vague. And vague costs you time on a Saturday when you're deciding what to build. Here's the sharper version, and the reason behind it. 🛠 WHAT I'VE ACTUALLY DONE FOR 30 YEARS I've never liked selling my hours or trading time for money. What I've been good at is building something once and letting it pay me while I do something else. An Android security app I built checked installed apps against a blacklist. Two weeks to build. It started making money, so I iterated hard on it, and it ran for years paying me roughly $1,000 a day in ad revenue....banner ads at that. Locate My Kindle hit #1 Utility in the Amazon store and brought in an equal amount of revenue. 3 Ball was a three-minute lottery app. That one took me a year and only did roughly $1,000 a month And a lot of others you've never heard of, because most of them didn't work or were insignificant. That's the job. It's not only software. I started a supplement company and automated the entire thing: order, payment, shipping, returns. I built a portal that ran the call center scripting, the cross-sells and the upsells. Different product, same move. Build the machine once, let it run. That's what I mean by asset. Not "passive income," which is a lie people sell. It means the thing keeps working on the days you don't. I'll tell you the failure too. I get bored after the build. Several of those apps got delisted because I stopped maintaining them, and I lost interest in the supplement company the moment it was running clean. I left real money on the table for no reason other than the
0
0
📌 Where I've been, and why this community is changing
Pinned
👋 Welcome to AI Revenue Club
Glad you're here. This community exists for one reason: To help you build AI products that become assets, then turn those assets into an AI Product Portfolio. 💡 Idea → 📦 Product → 💰 Asset → 📈 Portfolio Whether you've never built an app or you've shipped dozens, you're in the right place. 👇 Introduce yourself: - Your name - Where you're from - What you want to build first 💬 One question before you dive in...Which stage are you at?
Poll
1 member has voted
0
0
Pinned
Why I'm Here
I’ve spent my life building software. I started coding at 12. Built startups for over 20 years. I've sold companies. I've also watched success disappear faster than I ever thought possible. That taught me something I wish I'd understood much earlier. One product can change your life. A portfolio of products can change your future. For years I thought bigger meant better. - Bigger teams. - Bigger funding. - Bigger exits. Today I believe something completely different. - Build products you own. - Turn those products into assets. - Turn those assets into an AI Product Portfolio. Because products can generate revenue. Assets can compound. Portfolios create freedom. That's why I build the way I do today. 💡 Idea → 📦 Product → 💰 Asset → 📈 Portfolio 🔧 WHAT I'VE BUILT - 20+ mobile apps with more than 10 million downloads - SaaS products from idea to scale - Ad networks and location-based advertising platforms - Automated trading systems managing $100M+ running at NY4, the NYSE data center - AI products and agent platforms - Physical products with fully automated operations - A company I took public on three European exchanges - Enterprise cloud architecture at a Fortune 200 - and much more... I've built things that worked. I've built things that failed. I'm going to show you both. Not the polished version. The real version. ⚡ WHY AI REVENUE CLUB EXISTS Most people use AI to build demos. Others use AI to serve clients. We're here to build AI Product Portfolios. That means learning how to: - choose the right ideas - validate demand before writing code - build products people actually pay for - grow those products into assets - build a portfolio that compounds over time You'll see the wins. You'll see the failures. You'll see the numbers. You'll see the decisions. Including the ones I'd never make again. No hype. No fake guru nonsense. Just real products, built in public. Currently doing all of this alongside a full-time job, just like many of you.
Why I'm Here
Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode token visibility finally exists
I kept burning through Claude Code tokens with no idea where they were going. No breakdown. No visibility. Just usage disappearing. So I built Token Bleed. Open source. Runs locally. Zero setup. One command and you get: - Per-project, per-session, per-prompt cost breakdown - Cache hit rate tracking (this is the biggest lever most builders are ignoring) - Model distribution -- see if you're running Opus on work that doesn't need it - Session compare -- diff two sessions side by side to find the cheaper approach - Log retention fix -- Claude Code deletes your logs after 30 days by default, this stops that The code is public on GitHub (MIT) and runs with a simple npx command. Watch the build, grab the command and run it against your own logs. Code - https://TokenBleed.dev or, just run it from the terminal - npx token-bleed
Qwen 3.6 Dethrones Opus 4.7, GPT 5.5 and Gemini 3.1
Everyone has a take on which AI model is best. Almost nobody runs the test. I put five models through the same coding task: GPT-5.5, Opus 4.7, Gemini 3.1, and two Qwen 3.6 models running locally for free via Ollama. Same prompt. One shot each. Final rankings: 1. Qwen 3.6 27B dense - 8/10 - 794 lines - $0 (49 min on M1 Max) 2. Claude Opus 4.7 - 7/10 - 613 lines - $1.65 (4.5 min) 3. Gemini 3.1 Pro - 585 lines - $0.26 (~5 min) 4. GPT-5.5 - 6/10 - 750 lines - $0.37 (~7 min) 5. Qwen 3.6 35B A3B MoE - last - 855 lines - $0 (~6 min) The 20%: bigger parameters did not mean better output. The MoE model was faster but inconsistent. The dense model was slower but delivered. That tradeoff is worth understanding before you pick a model for a real build. Full video breakdown is on YouTube. Play every build: GPT-5.5 (medium): https://assets.airevenueclub.com/playground/video-2/gpt-medium-snake.html GPT-5.5 (xhigh): https://assets.airevenueclub.com/playground/video-2/gpt-xhigh-snake.html Claude Opus 4.7: https://assets.airevenueclub.com/playground/video-2/claude-snake.html Gemini 3.1 Pro: https://assets.airevenueclub.com/playground/video-2/gemini-snake.html Qwen3.6-27B: https://assets.airevenueclub.com/playground/video-2/qwen_27b_snake.html Qwen3.6-35B-A3B: https://assets.airevenueclub.com/playground/video-2/qwen_35b_snake.html
0
0
1-9 of 9
powered by
AI Revenue Club
skool.com/autonomous-founders-2789
🟢 Build an AI Product Portfolio that pays you for years. Not just client work you sell once.
Build your own community
Bring people together around your passion and get paid.
Powered by