Democratizing AI: A rant.

Agent Zero should be like Linux in terms of adoption. In fact, Agent Zero is mostly Linux. It is a "Smart Linux". Not only can it maintain and optimize the Linux environment, it can put it to work. I'd say that is a new kind of OS. Based on Linux old school, yes, but now something VERY different. Chalk one up for democracy. A smart OS. Excellent!

But ( there's always a but )

The UX! THE UX! Its a UI only a geek's mother could love. Or developers.

We need a "thin layer of cool."

We need personas, at least. Some kind of Avatar would be great, but not mission critical. We need character voices though. This is where we can avoid a lot of the uncanny valley.

And the UX needs to talk about building agents. It needs to take in pertinent data and synthesize a new persona almost instantly and let me TALK to it.

Agents should be able to present visuals too. I suggest using a video conference scheme for the UI, where Agents can "share desktops".

I'm guessing you are looking at A0 as a kind of universal framework that anyone can use to do anything, and I can understand why. I have a different approach in mind: Anyone can have any kind of agent they want... sorta. Agents that want to participate in the ecosystem/community are required meet standards.

What are the constraints on the number of subagents A0 can have? From a performance standpoint, is it better to launch another A0, or it it better to add more compute to one instance? I'm trying to anticipate bottlenecks.

Thanks

7 comments