Salam! Although I have yet to embark on my journey in better understanding Shari'ah (this literally means "the clear, well-trodden path to water"), I have a great interest in politics, which may be of use to you. Like the other comments say, it is quite difficult to therefore explain religious, ethical, and legal principles that altogether combine to form Shari'ah in one comment, but I'll try! I will remind you that lots of Muslim countries follow a different branch of Islam: E.g., Oman follows Ibadism, Iran follows Shi'a Islam, and many other Muslim countries follow Sunni Islam. HOWEVER! If that's not complex enough, you also have different *schools of thought WITHIN* the above sect divisions: E.g., Hanafi, Shafi'i, Maliki, Hanbali schools of thought - Shi'as follow many other different schools of thought, like Zaydism and so on. The issue that arises here is that in order to enact Shari'ah, you need to study the following in order: 1) The Qur'an 2), The Sunnah 3) Ijma (seeking consensus from reputable Muslim scholars 4) Qiyas (analogical reasoning, used to derive rulings on new issues by comparing them to established rulings based on similar cases. ) You can see why there is a lot of dispute in allegedly Muslim countries that enact Shari'ah. There's the morality police only operating in Aceh, a small place in Indonesia, and then Iran and Saudi Arabia (both politically and religiously different!). That's because of the Ijma process, where some scholars may not be *as* educated or have the *experience* - both of which are necessary if you want to partake in the Shari'ah process. And so, there needs to be a sophisticated understanding of the Arabic language and the Fus'ha dialect for somebody to even pass a hate comment on something they do not know. If it's a Christian asking the question of how barbaric Shari'ah law is, maybe they should follow the entirety of their scripture, which allows for public virginity testing in Deuteronomy 22:13-19, or women marrying their rapists and getting 50 shekels from it in Deuteronomy 22:28-29, or accepting that women are the "weaker partner" (1 Peter 3:7), or that demolishing temples, idols and alters (Exodus 34:13) and apostasy in Deuteronomy 13:1-10 are all valid.

The profile picture looks satanic with the inverted pentagram (5 star), as popularised by the Church of Satan since 1968. LaVeyan Satanists sometimes pair the goat head with Hebrew letters at the five points of the pentagram to form the Sigil of Baphomet, so that would explain a lot. Plus, the followers-to-likes ratio is actually hilarious, so that means a majority of that account's followers are bots. Wouldn't be a new thing whatsoever as this has been ongoing for over 7 years now. You can read more about that here: https://amp.theguardian.com/media/2017/nov/26/anti-muslim-online-bots-fake-acounts?__twitter_impression=true