Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
What is this?
Less
More
1 contribution to Volturon Trading Systems
Post-Market Recap — Thursday, September 10
Two engines traded today and they had opposite days. Volturon worked the morning and lost 44.5 points. Secutor did nothing at all until noon, then took two trades and won both, capturing 60 points on the standard contract. The difference between them was not skill. It was timing, and today the timing was the whole game. The market: the producer price report arrived before the open and it was warm. Prices businesses pay rose 0.4% for the month, matching expectations, but the annual rate climbed to 5.4%, above forecast and up sharply from 4.8% in July. Energy was the driver, as the conflict with Iran continues to lift fuel costs. Traders responded immediately. The odds of a Federal Reserve rate increase next week jumped from 62% to 70%, Treasury yields pushed past 4.85% to three-year highs, and oil rose another 4%, with Brent crude reaching $105 after the largest spike in attacks on shipping since the war began. The European Central Bank also raised rates today, its second increase this year, with euro zone inflation now above 3%. Yesterday we mentioned that borrowing costs are climbing across the developed world at the same time. Today that stopped being a background observation and became an action. Now look at how the American indexes finished. The Nasdaq 100 fell 1.3%. The S&P 500 lost 0.6%. The Dow fell just 0.4%. On Tuesday we described the opposite arrangement. That day the Dow fell nearly four times as far as the Nasdaq, and we explained why: tariffs tax physical goods crossing borders, and the Dow is full of companies that ship physical things. Today the punishment landed on technology instead, and for an equally clear reason. Higher interest rates reduce the present value of profits expected years in the future, and that is precisely what a technology company sells. Chip makers took the worst of it, with Marvell, Intel and Lam Research each down about 3%. So within three sessions, the same market punished two different indexes for two entirely different reasons. That is Tuesday's lesson proven in reverse. Before deciding how a headline should affect your position, ask what your index actually holds.
3 likes • Sep 11
Really appreciated this recap, Steven. Thank you for all the detail. Your point about patience and timing really matched what I saw today. I did not trade the 9:30 open because I personally do not like the noise and back-and-forth that can happen right after major data releases. My style is much closer to what you described with Secutor: I prefer to wait until the market clearly shows control, then look for a pullback, confirmation, and continuation rather than trying to predict the move too early. After lunch, once the market was clearly bearish and the structure was much cleaner, I took two short trades: - 29,189.75 → 29,153.00, about +36 points - 29,153.25 → 29,133.25, +20 points What I liked most in your recap was the distinction between being directionally right and being early. Volturon had the right bearish idea, but Secutor waited for the market to actually establish the trend. That is very close to the approach I am trying to build: context → control → pullback → confirmation → continuation. Thanks again for sharing both the winning and losing side of the day. That makes the recap much more useful for learning.
1-1 of 1
Youcef Tamort
1
2 points to level up
@youcef-sid-ahmed-tamort-5505
YUSSUF futures trader nasdaq from USA

Active 56d ago
Joined Sep 10, 2026
United States