Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
What is this?
Less
More
3 contributions to Not Knowing
My baby and the giraffe 🦒
What do you mean it's not a giraffe???
My baby and the giraffe 🦒
1 like • 6d
Hi Viktor, Thanks for sharing your video! I appreciate the distinction you’re making between an actual living giraffe and an image of a giraffe. It made me wonder whether there’s another, perhaps more fundamental, distinction worth exploring. When we look at a living giraffe, a photograph, a drawing, or even a toy giraffe, we recognize all of them through the same conceptual distinction: “giraffe.” Of course, a photograph isn’t a living animal. But the recognition of “giraffe” occurs in each case. The same could apply to other senses. For example, hearing a giraffe making a sound directly versus hearing a recording of that sound. Both can evoke the same recognition, even though the actual source differs. So perhaps there are three things worth distinguishing: 1. The actual phenomenon — what is present in our experience, such as shapes, colors, movements, or sounds. 2. The conceptual distinction — the recognition through which we identify something as a “giraffe.” 3. What we’re referring to — an actual living animal, a photograph, a toy, or a recording. This brings me to something Peter explores in The Genius of Being: how our distinctions participate in creating our experienced world. When we look at a living giraffe, we don’t simply perceive “giraffe” independently of our conceptual framework. We recognize something through distinctions we’ve learned. Even characteristics such as shape, color, and movement already involve distinctions. So while I agree that a living giraffe and an image of one are different things, I wonder whether the more interesting inquiry is: What makes either one a “giraffe” in our experience in the first place? Does the concept “giraffe” merely describe something we already perceive, or does the distinction itself participate in creating what we experience as a giraffe? Curious to hear your thoughts!
Spiritual Bypassing vs. Transformation vs. Truth
I’ve been contemplating a distinction between three different reasons for doing spiritual practices: 1. To change our state or experience — to feel more peaceful, loving, connected, blissful, energized, etc. 2. To transform our being — changing how we actually relate, react, behave, and show up in life. 3. To become conscious of what is true — questioning assumptions and beliefs and becoming directly conscious of something rather than trying to produce a particular experience. This has become quite personal for me because I’m in a relationship with someone who is deeply involved in Kundalini yoga and other spiritual practices. She sometimes speaks about “channeling light,” raising energy, opening the heart, connecting to the higher self, etc. And I notice that this sometimes really annoys me. What’s interesting is that we’re both deeply interested in spirituality and increasing consciousness, yet at times it feels like we’re worlds apart in what we mean by that. I tend to become suspicious when spirituality seems primarily directed toward creating preferred states: more light, love, bliss, peace, elevated energy. Not because there is anything wrong with these experiences, but because I wonder whether constantly moving toward what we prefer can also become a way of moving away from what we don’t want to experience. This is where terms like spiritual bypassing and escapism come to mind. A spiritual practice can perhaps genuinely produce beautiful or profound experiences while simultaneously being used to avoid fear, anger, insecurity, conflict, grief, or other unwanted aspects of ourselves. The experience itself may be genuine; the question is what we’re using it for. It seems to me that transformation often requires something quite different. Rather than trying to transcend anger, fear, insecurity, jealousy, selfishness, conflict, etc., perhaps we need to encounter these things directly. Transformation may therefore sometimes feel worse rather than better. The uncomfortable situation or relationship might reveal much more about our being than another beautiful spiritual experience.
1 like • 23d
@Devin Henderson Thank you, Devin, for the elaborate reply. I think it would indeed be helpful for me to be more patient and try to listen behind the words — to understand what she actually means when she uses spiritual language that I wouldn’t necessarily use myself, and what those words represent for her. Rather than immediately interpreting, correcting, or trying to fit what she’s saying into my own framework, I can simply be curious and try to understand her experience more deeply. Regarding transformation, this is also how I perceive it. The challenge for me is accepting that some people around me may describe what they’re doing as spiritual work or transformation, while from my perspective it sometimes looks more like escaping uncomfortable feelings and trying to return to peace, bliss, or a preferred state without addressing the underlying issue. But perhaps part of my own work is being okay with that too. I don’t have to convince them otherwise. I can remain curious, recognize my own judgment, and let people follow their own path.
1 like • 23d
@Lilia Hrabar Thank you, Lilia. I resonate with what you say about getting triggered. I notice that when this happens, I can easily take the position of being the one who understands something more deeply. But that position itself is something for me to look into. The moment I assume that I know more than she does and start explaining things from that position, I’m identifying with something that isn’t actually known or perhaps even knowable. Instead, I can stay with what I directly perceive and speak from my own experience, without turning that into a claim about what is true for her.
🌀 Welcome to Not Knowing! 🌀 Start Here
We are glad you decided to join! The purpose here is simple: finding out what's true for yourself, in your own experience without any assumptions, beliefs or hearsay. What is true, what is really true? Real insight always arises from not knowing. Here's how to begin: 🌱 Step 1: Say hello Introduce yourself in the comments and tell us: what are you curious about, what are you investigating? A sentence or two is plenty. 💬 2. Share your insights, ask others Find someone with a question or interest you share and let them know. You don't need to have an answer. 🧭 3. Take the Start Here course Five short videos by Brendan to get you going: https://www.skool.com/not-knowing/classroom/2da2cfdc 📅 4. Join a Check-in Session with Brendan We meet every Tuesday for a live session for new members. Find the next one in the Calendar tab: https://www.skool.com/not-knowing/calendar P.S. Levels here run on likes. So when you say hello and reply to someone, like what you read too. That's how everyone gets to Level 2, which opens up more courses. Higher levels bring more rewards, including free online workshop seats. Have a look around the Classroom: https://www.skool.com/not-knowing/classroom “Increasing consciousness is the most important pursuit any human can undertake. Generally, people are stuck in a great deal of false realities that produce struggle, suffering, and discontent. Increasing consciousness frees us from this falsely limited world so we can access greater freedom and happiness, not to mention gain more effectiveness and creativity. Becoming more conscious takes investigation, learning, and contemplation. We provide these tools and support.” — Peter Ralston
1 like • 28d
Hi everyone! 👋 I’m Willem from Haarlem, the Netherlands. I’m exploring Ralston’s work, especially distinguishing direct knowing from beliefs and understanding emotions in relationships to become a better partner and parent. Happy to be here—any fellow Dutchies around? 🇳🇱
1 like • 25d
@Corentin G great! I would love to join a next one.
1-3 of 3
Willem Oudemans
2
9 points to level up
@willem-oudemans-5540
.

Active 7h ago
Joined Sep 10, 2026
NETHERLANDS
Powered by