Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
What is this?
Less
More

Owned by Vincent

CISSP Study Group

1.8k members • Free

Share resources, get advice, and connect with peers studying cybersecurity. Join our CISSP study group and connect with fellow professionals today!

OpenAI Study Group

1 member • Free

Share resources, get advice, and connect with peers studying for OpenAI certifications! Join our Study Group and meet fellow professionals today!

Memberships

Skoolers

181.6k members • Free

650 contributions to CISSP Study Group
CISSP Practice Question (Domain 5: Identity & Access Management / Privileged Access Controls)
During a quarterly access review, an organization discovers that several DevOps engineers have accumulated multiple privileged roles across different cloud environments due to automated provisioning workflows that never revoked old permissions. No misuse has been detected, but the roles collectively exceed least-privilege requirements and present a potential lateral-movement risk. What should the security manager do FIRST? A. Immediately disable all excessive roles and force users to request access again B. Conduct a risk analysis to understand business impact before removing permissions C. Implement just-in-time privileged access to eliminate standing permissions D. Escalate the issue to HR for potential policy violations
CISSP Practice Question (Domain 7: Security Operations / Supply Chain Risk)
An enterprise discovers that a widely used third-party monitoring agent embedded in multiple production servers has begun making undocumented outbound connections to an IP range controlled by a subcontractor the enterprise has never engaged. The agent is critical for operational visibility, and disabling it would blind several detection controls. No malicious activity has been confirmed, but threat intelligence reports suggest recent supply chain compromises involving similar agents. What should the security manager do FIRST? A. Immediately isolate all hosts running the agent from the network B. Conduct a rapid supplier risk reassessment and verify the legitimacy of the subcontractor relationship C. Disable the agent across production to eliminate potential exfiltration D. Escalate directly to regulators due to potential third-party data exposure
0 likes • 21h
@Hassan Hassan Correct Answer (B) — Conduct a rapid supplier risk reassessment and verify the legitimacy of the subcontractor relationship. A sudden undocumented third-party connection from a critical monitoring agent is a supply chain risk indicator, not yet a confirmed incident. CISSP logic requires verifying the legitimacy and scope of third-party relationships BEFORE taking actions that would disrupt critical security controls.
CISSP Practice Question (Domain 7: Security Operations / Incident Response + AI Context)
Rymar Tech’s SOC deploys a new AI-based anomaly detection system that suddenly begins generating an unusually high volume of high-risk alerts after being retrained with third-party data the previous night. No malicious activity has been confirmed, but the alert surge is overwhelming SOC analysts and impacting monitoring effectiveness. What should the incident response manager do FIRST? A. Disable the AI platform and revert to manual triage B. Escalate to the CISO and declare a security incident C. Initiate the incident response process beginning with detection and verification D. Conduct a model validation review with the third-party integrator
1 like • 2d
@Allison Regan Correct Answer (C) Initiate the incident response process beginning with detection and verification. A surge of AI-generated alerts—especially after a model update—requires verification before escalation. CISSP exam logic always emphasizes confirming an event before declaring an incident or disabling critical security tooling.
CISSP Practice Question (Domain 1: Security and Risk Management)
A regional bank adopts a new third-party transaction-scoring engine hosted in the cloud. The vendor refuses to provide detailed architectural diagrams but offers recent SOC 2 Type II reports. Executives want rapid deployment, but regulators recently flagged the bank for weak vendor oversight. What is the MOST appropriate next step? A. Require the vendor to provide full network diagrams before integration B. Review and validate the SOC 2 report against the bank’s control objectives C. Conduct a full on-site audit of the vendor’s operations D. Delay onboarding until regulators approve the vendor’s environment
0 likes • 3d
@Allison Regan That's correct. The bank must strengthen vendor-risk oversight while still enabling timely deployment. A SOC 2 Type II report is an independent attestation of the vendor’s security controls, and validating it against the bank’s own requirements is the most appropriate governance-first action. This satisfies due diligence without imposing unrealistic delays or demands.
CISSP Practice Question – Domain 4 (Secure Network Design & Key Management)
A multinational enterprise operates a highly distributed microservices architecture across multiple cloud providers.All traffic between microservices must be encrypted and authenticated. To simplify governance, the company wants a single global certificate hierarchy for all workloads across all clouds and on-prem systems. However, several constraints apply: - Private keys must never leave the host or container where they are created. - Certificate issuance must support auto-scaling, ephemeral workloads, and identity rotation every few minutes. - The environment includes legacy systems that cannot use modern service mesh sidecars. - Security monitoring requires centralized revocation and trust-state visibility across all issuers. Which PKI architecture BEST satisfies these requirements? A. single monolithic root CA issuing certificates directly to all cloud and on-prem workloads. B. Multiple independent PKIs, each cloud provider managing its own root and workload certificates. C. A federated PKI with one offline enterprise root and cloud-specific subordinate CAs, each issuing short-lived, locally generated keypairs. D. Use self-signed certificates generated per workload and synchronize fingerprints centrally for trust verification.
2 likes • 5d
@Eduardo Polanco Correct Answer: C. A federated PKI with one offline enterprise root and cloud-specific subordinate CAs, each issuing short-lived, locally-generated keypairs. Federated PKI gives you policy centralization + operational distribution — minimal key exposure, the ability to scale and rotate, and a governance model that meets audit and revocation visibility needs.
1-10 of 650
Vincent Primiani
7
5,563points to level up
Cybersecurity. The Study Group Guy.

Active 10h ago
Joined Apr 29, 2024
New York, NY
Powered by