📊 Case Study: How I Passed a 100K Challenge in 4 Days (Process Breakdown)
This is not a post about speed, profits, or copying trades. It’s a breakdown of the process, rules, and decisions that allowed me to pass a 100K challenge without violating discipline. The firm was Apex Funded Traders. The profit target was $106,000. The total drawdown was $3,000. There was no daily loss limit, but I imposed my own. 🛑 Rule #1: I Set My Own Daily Loss Limit Even though there was no daily loss limit, I created one. My personal rule: - Max daily loss: -$500 - If hit, I stopped trading for the day This prevented: - Emotional spirals - “One more trade” behavior - Giving back gains Having self-imposed rules mattered more than firm rules. 🧠 Rule #2: I Focused on Risk Control, Not Trade Count I did not focus on: - How many trades I took - Being active - Forcing setups I focused on: - Risk-to-reward (2:4 minimum) - Clean execution - Protecting drawdown The number of trades is irrelevant if risk is controlled. What matters is how much you can lose, not how often you click. 📉 Risk & Execution Framework - Instrument: ES - Size: 4–8 contracts - Style: Sharp, in-and-out moves - Goal: A few clean ticks with structure I intentionally switched my P&L display to ticks instead of price. This helped my psychology by: - Reducing emotional attachment to dollar amounts - Keeping focus on execution quality - Preventing overreaction to fluctuations This is not required — just something that worked for me. 📐 Strategy Context (High Level) I traded a combination of structure-based concepts: - Opening Range Break - Clear rejection candles to confirm direction - Trendlines for structure - Entries, exits, and stops based on trendlines — not emotion Trendlines determined: - Where I entered - Where I exited - Where I was wrong I did not chase moves. If price didn’t respect structure, I stayed out. 🕒 Sessions Traded I traded all sessions. The session itself did not determine my trade.