Hey everybody, I got stuck a while ago, and I had to let the project go. It's just a goofy content concept, but I haven't seriously been able to attempt a project since, I think perhaps I would like to share it: https://www.instagram.com/artbreeds/ Since this was done a while ago, I like to think that I "stopped before I slopped". I don't think I did. I think it was because of a comment on one of the images: "Can I buy it?" It was a bot, ofc, but still. I had named it "better way". No you cannot buy my better way. Someone found the way. I did hope they would.

So this one is the ultimate Clief Notes community bringing disparate threads together post. So reader, consider this your warning upfront. @Alyshia Perri and I were talking and she was keen to get feedback on her entry in the coach competition. I tried to do that in DM to begin with, and then realised I was babbling. I asked her permission to fork it and make my edits so I could *show* her what I was trying to describe and she gave me that permission. None of the rest of this happens without her and she also gave me permission to post this. So here’s a brave woman who’s willing to let me link to a repo showing how I messed with her baby because I couldn’t find better words for the teaching. Please tell her how awesome she is, because that is *gutsy*. One of the coaching offerings in this repo was “board mode” which runs an idea past three different perspectives, each with a different agenda and angle of attack to help the user. I’m going to be upfront and say these sorts of mechanics in AI are generally not to my taste for a bunch of reasons. I don’t think they are effective, let’s keep it to that. But on my mind was the recent podcast by @Curtis Hays and @Brooke Hays showing the impact of using Jungian thinking archetypes / Myers-Briggs profiles to genuinely give the way agents approach things different flavours. What I did: - I got the model to do a sub-agent pass first using the roles as written - I took the three roles as stated and identified which profiles applied to these roles from my point of view - the skeptical stakeholder got “ESTJ”, the peer who has been burned got “ISFJ”, future self got “INFJ”. Then we did it again and compared the outputs - I added two new roles that I felt were missing - the logic stress tester (INTP) and the values-holder (INFP) - I felt off the results of these that Amund as the synthesiser was missing a trick. I tried two separate synthesis passes (over the first rounds, the second round, and all five together) - one using an ENFJ synthesiser and another using an INTJ one.

What do you wish you understood better? 👇 I want to hear from everyone. Every level. Day one or day one thousand. There's no question too small, too basic, or too "I feel like I should already know this." If you've ever wondered how something works, what something means, or how to do it, that's exactly what I want. Two quick things 👇 1️⃣ Vote in the poll for the big topics you want more of. 2️⃣ Drop your specific question in the comments. The more specific, the better. The comments can serve as building a list from your answers. The creators in this group are incredible, and once we know what you're asking for, we can make the content that answers it. (This is a post aimed at helping all of us make more engaging content) Even if you mostly read and rarely post, this is an opportunity to have someone write about something you may not have an answer for. One question from you might be the exact thing ten other people were too shy to ask. 😊 We learn together, we grow together, we win together! 🤓💪🏆Bas Question: What do you want us to make more content on?

We just broke 40k Members, in less then 4 months... To say I am honored and blown away is an understatement. I feel like yesterday @Matthew Creamer quit his job to sleep on my floor and bust out 15 hour days to build out content, structure and anything else I thought you all would need to make this community worth it. But at the end of the day there is only one thing for me to say. THANKYOU None of this, and I mean NONE of this would be remotely worth it if it wasn't for you all. To list and tag everyone that have contributed so much valuable not just to this community but to me would be nearly impossible. Thank you to every single one of you. Thank you for commenting and helping out on posts Thank you for sharing the wins you have gotten both at home and professionally. Thank you for believing in me and what I am building septically those of you who have been around since the beginning (you know who you are). I cannot tell you how happy my heart is to get in front of you all and teach, talk, ask questions and even learn a lot myself. It is a dream come true to become someone that people can learn from; to share my thoughts and have those very thoughts change the way people live their lives and do their work. It's only the beginning too, I can't wait to see what the rest of the year has in store, and I promise to keep building, working and recording for you all. From the very very very bottom of my heart.....Thankyou! Thankyou to every single one of you reading this and for being part of such an amazing community.

Everyone argues about which model is best. GPT, Claude, Gemini. Almost nobody can tell you the layers their AI is actually standing on. So here is how the thing you use every day actually works. Picture it as a city. At the bottom is the land. The models. The raw intelligence. On their own they can only talk. They cannot do anything. On top of the land you get storefronts. The harnesses. These are the tools that let a model actually act. Read your files, run code, search the web, remember what happened last time. When you say you are "using AI," this is almost always the layer you are touching. Not the model. The storefront built on top of it. Here is the catch most people never feel until it bites them. The storefronts do not talk to each other. Your context, your history, your setup, none of it travels. Switch tools and you start from zero on a fresh plot of land. So the layer everyone is now chasing is the roads. The connective bit. The thing that lets your work move between tools, lets you hand it off, lets you build pipelines on top instead of babysitting one chat at a time. That is the part I want to talk about. Because you do not have to wait for someone to sell you the roads. That is ICM. We have been laying those roads out of numbered folders and plain markdown the whole time. > Your context travels between tools. Copy the folder. > Anyone can change the pipeline. Open a markdown file. > Hand the whole thing to a teammate. Send them the folder. No platform. No deploy. No lock-in. A workspace is a folder, and a folder goes anywhere. And once the road is yours, you build on it. Run stages in parallel. Have one model check another model's work. Ask two models the same question and compare. None of that needs a framework. It needs structure you can read. ICM does not do everything, and it does not pretend to. Real-time, high concurrency, fifty agents talking at once, that is a framework's job and ICM says so out loud. But most work is not fifty agents. Most work is five stages and a human who wants to see each one.