Working with the EU on anything AI/systems is a headache in itself, so many rules to follow without even realizing that your VPS has to be hosted in the EU. Crazy stuff. Short story time, I had a project with a Medium sized company in Sweden, we were building a Facebook prospecting system. Now the thing is that they wanted a feature (quick note: I had already built the system with GDPR in mind, using Hetzner and all) that involved scraping individual profiles, which isn't really allowed. Now the question is, with AI giving you a workaround for almost anything, how far would you go before your morals stepped in. For me it's simple, if it even comes close to crossing the line legally or morally, it's a big no. Huge shoutout to @Tiffany Coyle for educating me on GDPR!

🎟️ PRIZE: FREE SEAT IN THE LYCEUM 🎟️ Pick your cohort. Technical, Business, or Creator. Your call. ---- 🇬🇧 We're back. Good morning from London. 👋 Thanks for the patience last week. Jake and I needed a few days to breathe before London Tech Week kicked off, and you all responded with nothing but support. We don't take that for granted. Now let's get back to building. ---- 📋 THE CHALLENGE Build a folder-based AI operator that handles ONE operational workflow end-to-end. You pick the workflow. This week's deliverable is one operator folder that someone could drop into a Claude project and use to handle a real business workflow without babysitting. ---- 🎯 PICK YOUR WORKFLOW The workflow is yours. Pick something specific. Pick something you'd actually use. A few sparks to get you thinking: - 🎫 Customer support triage (which tier handles this ticket?) - ✅ Content review and approval - 📨 Lead intake and qualification - 💸 Refund request handler - 🤝 Partnership pitch evaluator - 🎙️ Podcast guest pitch sorter - 💼 Freelance project intake - 📄 Resume screen for one specific role - 📅 Meeting request triage (book, decline, delegate) The more specific, the better. "Customer support" is too broad. "Refund request triage for an ecommerce store doing under 200 orders per month" is right. 📎 If you want a fully written client brief as a reference, the attached PDF walks through one example. Don't build the example. Use it as a template for how to think about scoping your own operator. ---- 🗂️ THE METHODOLOGY If this is your first comp, welcome. Here's what you need to know: This week (and every week) you're learning interpretable context methodology. Folders as architecture. Each file does one job well. Your operator is a folder with five things: - 📄 identity.md (who the operator is and what workflow they own) - 📐 rules.md (the decision logic: criteria, edge cases, escalation rules) - 💬 examples.md (decisions in action, including at least one edge case) - 📚 reference/ (checklists, templates, rubrics) - 📖 README.md (how to use it)

Working multiplayer mini-golf game. Lobby codes, real-time ball sync, Cloudflare Durable Objects on the back, Discord Embedded App SDK on the front, three holes, emotes. It runs. That's the floor. Now I'm handing it to you. The challenge. Fork the repo. Add a Mario Kart style twist: one player's action affects another player's ball. Banana peel, ink cloud, magnet, kraken grab, putter-jam. Pick your mechanic. Ship it as a functional multiplayer build. Par: 40 prompts. Every message you type to your AI of choice counts as one. Manual edits are free. Reading code is free. Tool calls inside a single prompt are free. The number is the messages. Rules in the README. Log every prompt to PROMPT_LOG.md in your fork, honour system, lowest count under par wins. → github.com/PUSHINGSQUARES/pirate-putty The reason for 40 is not the code. The interesting work is the brief. You can't brute-force this. You have to think before you type, batch the asks, design the mechanic on paper, then deliver the spec in fewer, denser prompts. That is the skill. The game is the proof. HAVE FUN!!! //A<3

came back after a week offline and spent an hour just reading posts. people are shipping. full agent teams, named specialists, live clients. and i'm still on the foundation. but here's the honest version of what's actually happening. i build something. it works. then i look at it and realise it's not what i actually wanted. so i break it and start again. then halfway through the rebuild, a new idea comes in and now i don't know if i should finish what i started or pivot to the thing that's clearly better. i've rebuilt the same system three times in a month. and the worst part.. each version was better than the last. so was the rebuilding wrong? or is that just what building actually looks like before it locks in? genuinely asking because i can't tell if this is a me problem or if everyone here is quietly doing the same thing and just posting the final version.

Fake Account pretending to be me, report and deal with it how you can. https://www.instagram.com/the_real_venceslau?igsh=cG9rbTN2M3Iyd3Rx