Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

Inspiring Philosophy Academy

56 members • $25/month

4 contributions to Inspiring Philosophy Academy
Sneak Peak: What’s Coming
We’ve got some exciting things in the works at IPA. This week we’re beginning development on a brand-new course covering Bayesian Epistemology and Rational Belief Formation alongside one of the leading scholars in the world working in this area. The goal isn’t just to teach Bayes’ Theorem. We want to help you understand how rational belief revision actually works, how evidence affects probability, how cumulative cases are built, and how these principles apply to questions about Christianity, history, miracles, science, and everyday reasoning. We’re also going to be building practical tools alongside the course, including: 📊 A Bayes Calculator 📈 Evidence-weighting tools 🧠 Interactive probability visualizations 🔬 Resources to help you apply Bayesian reasoning to real-world arguments and evidence If you had a chance to learn a topic with us: what topic? And what scholars would you want to hear from?
0 likes • 7d
@Apollos Christian Apologetics I like that. This would be a course for people to even get used to the whole framework of Bayesian reasoning. What you’re describing is something that would come (by my lights) *after* someone gains a competency in the framework itself. The case examples you bring up then are just getting reps in of the things we learn rather than just giving people answers. What do you think?
1 like • 7d
@James Hoogmoed I love the divine hiddeness one. Especially because I think DH is one of those places where philosophy, psychology and biblical and pastoral theology all meet.
Two Powers Reference in 1 Kings?
I haven't done a whole deep dive into this text that I stumbled upon when reading my Bible this morning, but it seems to mirror this "two powers in heaven" idea that we see during the 2nd Temple period, or at least it seems to be something similar. Please let me know if anyone knows about this reference, or if anyone else has commented on it before: In 1 Kings 19:9-14, Elijah is in the wilderness, after running away from Queen Jezebel, after she ordered the death of Elijah. Elijah makes his way to a cave after the angel of Yahweh gives him food and water. The text then says: "Then the word of the LORD came to him, saying, “What are you doing here, Elijah?” He answered, “I have been very zealous for the LORD, the God of hosts, for the Israelites have forsaken your covenant, thrown down your altars, and killed your prophets with the sword. I alone am left, and they are seeking my life, to take it away.” (1 Ki 19:9–10, NRSVue) Notice here how, when Elijah is describing the situation, very explicitly to "the word of the Lord", Elijah says "...for the Israelites have forsaken YOUR covenant, thrown down YOUR altars, and killed YOUR prophets with the sword." So, we can see here that one "subject" asks Elijah a question, and Elijah responds to that subject, attributing the covenant, altars, and prophets to that same subject. The text, however, doesn't stop there: Then (very importantly) the word of the Lord tells Elijah to "...go out and stand on the mountain before the LORD, for the LORD is about to pass by." We could derive a similar 2 Powers motif from this part alone, but I think there is even stronger support if we continue. Then Elijah hears and sees a great wind, an earthquake, and a great fire, but the text says that the Lord was not in any of them. The Lord was, however, in the "...sound of sheer silence." Now, interestingly, the exchange between Elijah and the LORD is the exact same exchange that we see between the word of the LORD and Elijah: What are you doing here, Elijah?” He answered, “I have been very zealous for the LORD, the God of hosts, for the Israelites have forsaken your covenant, thrown down your altars, and killed your prophets with the sword."
5 likes • 30d
Commenting now so you know I see this. But will have to come back to this tomorrow most likely!
Can a necessary being be caused?
In GodLogic’s discussion with Mohammad Hijab, Hijab asked GL this question. And to many people this seemed like a slam dunk on GL. However, this couldn’t be further from the truth. Wanted to do a temperature check on your guys’ intuitions and thoughts here. What do you guys think?
Can a necessary being be caused?
3 likes • Apr 27
@Matthew Herrada this is a route that I was thinking of as well! But for the purpose of this post, I’m wanting people to see a pathway where the answer to the question is “yes, a necessary being can be caused” and get the fundamentals down. As for what you’re saying….im cooking up a fun argument on this topic ;)
1 like • Apr 28
@Mitchell Hanson EXACTLY!
Why not? Let’s tackle a viral Muslim objection.
I’ve noticed that Muslims are going around with a silly objection lately. But sadly, it’s trapping a lot of Christians. I’ll share the objection here in hopes that we can workshop how to exegete the solution the VERY manufactured problem. The objection: Jesus says He will not drink of the “fruit of the vine” until the eschaton, but then later drinks wine. Matthew 26:29 “I tell you, I will not drink again of this fruit of the vine until that day when I drink it new with you in my Father’s kingdom.” John 19:28–30 Jesus, on the cross, is given sour wine, which he tastes/drinks. The basic inference line 1. If Jesus vows to not do X, and then later does X, then he broke his vow 2. Jesus vows to not drink the fruit of the vine (Matthew verse) 3. Jesus drinks sour wine which is from grapes still (John) 4. Therefore Jesus broke his Vow Looking forward to your thoughts guys!
0 likes • Apr 24
@Danielle Robinson getting even closer! Okay let’s slow down more. You’re right to bring up the blood of the covenant. What central Jewish theme or celebration is blood used for? What does that have to do with Israel’s history, and is that celebration in the context of the Last Supper?
1 like • Apr 24
@Robert Anderson yes! Specifically, the Passover cup. It’s a very specific reference. Jesus says THIS cup. The fruit of the vine is a liturgical phrase constantly embedded in the Passover cup. So in Matthew: Jesus says He will not drink of the Passover cup until the eschaton In John: Jesus refuses the Passover cup, then drinks the sour wine.
1-4 of 4
Than Christopoulos
3
39points to level up
@than-christopoulos-5608
I like food

Active 19h ago
Joined Oct 2, 2025
Powered by