Easter is a reminder that resurrection is real. Not just theologically. Entrepreneurially. Every one of you has had a business idea that died. A launch that flopped. A version of yourself you had to bury. A season where you looked at what you built and wondered if it was over. The same power that rolled the stone away is the same power that gets you back to the laptop. Back to the whiteboard. Back to the vision that everyone else said was dead. Entrepreneurs do not quit. They resurrect. So today, wherever you are in your journey, whether you are in the middle of your best season or sitting in the dark wondering if anything is going to work, let Easter remind you of this: the season that felt like failure was a training ground preparing you for the future of what is to come. He has risen. We will to. Happy Easter. From my family to yours. Jason

The reason your Facebook posts die after 2 lines has nothing to do with your content. It has everything to do with your opening. Facebook cuts your post off before anyone sees the value. That invisible wall is your first real test as a communicator, and most people fail it before they even realize the game is being played. Two lines. That is all you get. Line 1 needs to create a pull so strong they physically cannot scroll past it. A bold claim, a sharp truth, or a gap their brain needs to close. Line 2 delivers a specific promise or flips their expectation on its head entirely. Not "Here are some tips for entrepreneurs." Try this instead: "I watched a competitor steal my audience in 30 days. Here is exactly how they did it." Or this: "Most business owners are one post away from being ignored permanently. Make sure it is not yours." The goal is not to be clever. The goal is to create a moment where scrolling past feels like leaving something unfinished. If your first two lines do not create that feeling, the rest of your content does not matter. Rewrite them before you publish anything else. ***Get my Hook Mastery App Generator in the classroom. Based off of Alex Hormozi's system. Free guide below. 👇***

I’ve been testing out Perplexity’s new "Model Council" feature and it’s a total game-changer for serious research. Here’s why... Instead of querying a single AI model and just hoping it’s accurate, Model Council lets you ask your question to multiple top-tier models simultaneously. It’s like having a team of experts debate your question and then having a senior chair summarize the final conclusion. I wanted to share a breakdown of how it works and the major benefits I’ve found. What is Perplexity Model Council? Model Council is a feature that allows you to: * Select three frontier AI models (like GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini). * Ask a single, complex research question. * The system runs your query through all three models at once. * Each model generates its own complete answer. * A separate, sophisticated "synthesizer" model then reviews all three outputs, resolves conflicts, and produces one combined final response that is more accurate and balanced. It also highlights where the models agreed, where they disagreed, and what unique perspective each one added. Key Benefits of Using Model Council... For me, the shift has been about moving from a "confident answer" to a "clearer level of confidence." Here are the biggest advantages: * Triple Validation and Higher Accuracy: By comparing three independent model outputs, it acts as a powerful fact-checker, significantly reducing the chance of relying on a hallucination from a single model. * Surfaces Blind Spots and Disagreements: It forces you to see the nuance. The comparison view makes it immediately clear where different top-tier models have different information or perspectives. * Leverages Multiple Strengths: No single model is best at everything. Model Council allows you to combine the reasoning logic of one model with the coding ability of another and the creative writing style of a third, all in one go. * Significant Time Savings: It eliminates the tedious workflow of manually cutting and pasting the same prompt into ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, and then trying to synthesize the answers yourself.

You think your plans didn’t work out? Sunita Williams and Barry Wilmore launched expecting a week-long mission. They came home nearly ten months later. Let that satisfying little itinerary you mapped out for your life marinate on that for a second. These two packed eight days' worth of patience and had to stretch it across 286. No popping out for a walk. No comfort food. No rebooking on a different flight. Just the black vacuum of space and a return date that kept not existing. Meanwhile, most of us spiral when: → We hit traffic and act like the universe has personally wronged us. → A promotion takes a quarter longer than we expected. → One "no" lands in our inbox and suddenly the whole dream is dead. Williams and Wilmore couldn't refresh a tracking page. They couldn't call customer service. They couldn't do anything except stay sharp, stay sane, and trust that a solution was being built beneath them. Literally. And eventually, it was. They made it back. There's something almost embarrassing about comparing our everyday frustrations to actual orbital limbo. But that's kind of the point. Your delayed project isn't floating 250 miles above Earth with no exit door. Plans will unravel. Timelines will lie to you. The thing you thought would take a week will take a year. That's not failure. That's just how it works. If two people can hold it together through nine months of unplanned space, you can survive your detour. via~ Austin Armstrong

Use this prompt- upload a reference photo into an LLM for a cybernetic blueprint photo. Drop your result in the comments. CYBERNETIC PROMPT: A high-precision technical blueprint portrait ink drawing on aged, textured paper. The drawing features [USER_FACE], in the identical upward-looking 3/4 profile pose as seen in image_0.png. This new portrait precisely replicates all the internal mechanical cybernetic integration (gears, pistons, wires, conduits) within the temple, jaw, neck, and integrated collar, identical in complexity and placement to image_0.png. The background paper is completely covered with an identical, dense, and complex network of technical engineering annotations, dimension lines, leader arrows, and grid patterns, matching the locations and detailed technical terminology (including all specific dimension values like '3.50', '1.25' and phrases like 'REINFORCED PISTON ASSEMBLY' and 'FUNCTIONAL PARAMETERS') found in image_0.png. The style is detailed black ink hatching and stippling.