I have been working on a set-piece scene that ends a chapter for the past week and all the feedback I get keeps telling me it doesn't work; but in the same breath, all of that feedback is completely disregarding the fact that it's a SINGLE SCENE inside a 5-Act book. Feedback mostly consisting of: 1. "Well, you didn't explain that yet so it's confusing." 2. "Well, this character isn't established yet, so it's problematic and dehumanizing." 3. "This is not believable for a human, and blah blah blah." After EXPLICIT instructions that let them know that all of those things are addressed LATER in the story. 1. No, it's not explained yet; that's part of the mystery, we explain it in Act 2 2. Of course this character isn't established, we just met them in this scene, and they are traumatized and confused. 3. Yeah, he's meta-human the reader/other characters don't know that yet, that's why he seems overpowered right now because he's the narrator of this Act, and why would he reveal that to you? It's like people don't remember how stories work anymore and expect complete arc resolutions on one page. The pearl clutching and the instant gratification expectations are seriously frustrating me, and I'm about ready to just stop all together. When did we stop (as a society) appreciating layered, multisectional, slow burn, mysteries and expect everything spoon-fed to use in the first chapter? I just don't get it, and if it's, this hard just getting accurate valuable feedback this early, I really don't see the point in continuing.