I’ve had my Reddit account for two years. Now I’m looking at it differently. 😂 I found people struggling to build and submit an app without a Mac. Questions, frustrations, and roadblocks I recognized because I just lived through them. That’s market research without sending out a survey. 🔎 What are people repeatedly getting stuck on? 🛠️ What have they already tried? 💬 What words do THEY use to describe the problem? I’m exploring it as a way to connect with potential clients too. But a frustrated comment isn’t automatically a buyer. My approach is to listen, contribute something useful, and respect each community’s rules before sharing an offer. Nobody ordered a sales pitch with their question. 😂 You don’t have to reveal your whole product idea to do this. Search for the problem it solves. Your little research mission: Find three Reddit posts about the same problem and write down what keeps coming up. That repeated pattern is worth investigating. 🧡

When you build something, you already know where everything is. Your customer doesn’t have that little map in their head. Try a five-minute test: 🧪 Give someone one task, like finding a lesson or submitting a sample report. 🤐 Let them try without explaining where to click. Whew. That part takes discipline. 😂 📝 Notice where they pause, go backward, or ask, “What does this mean?” That hesitation gives you something specific to improve. Maybe the button needs a clearer name. Maybe the next step is missing. You can use a sample screen with made-up information. No secret sauce required. 🧡 Your action: Let one person try one task in your product without coaching, and note the first place they get stuck.

Follow me down this rabbit hole 🕳️ Someone just built an app that lets ChatGPT and Claude talk to each other in one group chat, I saw this on Reddit. One model leads, the other reviews, and then they compare notes. I've been doing THIS 👀🤷🏾‍♀️ by hand for a year. This is my way to get a second opinion or a different perspective and find “Gaps” . I use ChatGPT to check claims and contracts and Claude to build, and I carry the answers back and forth between them. Three lessons from this: 1. Your daily workaround may be a product. If you've been doing something by hand for months, someone may already be building it. That someone could be you. That's Pattern2Products Thinking 🥸 2. Two models catch more than one. Each AI misses different things, and the places where they disagree show you what to check. 3. Stay the human in the loop. Automation moves faster, but it also passes along weak ideas faster. When you do the relay yourself, you choose who leads, what gets passed along, and when the answer is good enough. New tools need time to mature. Your judgment doesn't. Your sprint: Finish this sentence. "One thing I do by hand every week that could become a product is ______." Post it below and reply done.👇🏾 P.S. I didn’t know people were doing this! I’m going to try it without the API because an API would charge you per message. I’m sure there is a workaround 😝 Imagine Kevin and Sheila in the same chat

Here’s another sprint 🏃🏾‍♀️ When your product is new and there's nothing to compare it to, nobody is looking for it. You can't sell on reputation or referrals yet. So don't lead with the product. Lead with an audit. The path: 1. Free discovery call: listen while they name the problem. 2. Paid audit: measure that problem in their own data. 3. Findings report: show what the problem is costing them. 4. Pilot: your product fixes the gap you just proved. 5. Case result: that becomes proof for your next client. Why it works: An audit is a small, safe first yes. It gets you paid, gives you proof, and hands you the number your pricing is built on. One rule: Diagnose on the call, but don't solve. Give them one clear insight, and save the full answer for the audit. Your sprint: Name one audit you could sell before your product. "I could audit ______ to show them ______." Post it below and reply done.👇🏾

This week I watched women in another AI community explain how they land clients. Their answers split into three models, shown in the image. Proof-first: show your work and get a quick yes. It's fast, but each client pays less. Problem-first: pick a niche that's hurting, listen before you pitch, and let them name the gap. It's slower, but each client is worth more, and it can lead to licensing and partnerships. Network-first: start with people who already trust you, get referred to buyers, and price above the market median. It works best for institutional clients. None of them is wrong. You just need to know which one you're running.🏃🏾‍♀️💨 Your sprint: Which model are you running? Fill in this sentence. "The niche I know is hurting is ______, and the problem they feel is ______." Post it below and reply done.👇🏾 Save this image for reference.👍🏾