Has the OpenClaw hype finally died down? Why did openAI bother buying into this hype machine?
At this point I don't think much of the hype around OpenClaw. I appreciate its community-driven ecosystem, but its flawed architecture lacks coherence. While pioneering is important, there are better alternatives with their own pros and cons. Autonomous bots are likely to improve, but here's a reality: I created my own autonomous bot 72 hours using Claude Code. It wasn't due to my intelligence but asking better questions. I prioritized security, governance, scalability, structure, and form, leading to a more personalized, meticulous, and deterministic decision-making process. This wasn't hard, and many others are doing similar things. In my opinion, Claude Code is better for system development. I think OpenClaw's initial appeal was its easy-out-of-the-box start up, it's Telegram and WhatsApp communication, and ability to own it's environment, which attracted users. I set up this functionality in Claude Code in three days, but it was more structured, with better access control and far better memory systems. If you plan to automate, establish a governance framework first. This approach is more effective and overlooked by the OpenClaw community. They prioritize pushing boundaries over setting initial limits and gradually expanding them. Instead of building a trust platform, they create a creative and opportunistic one lacking a foundation in trust, making it potentially unviable in the long run. Users who've been using it for a month or so start to realize the hype is excessive. Achieving desired outcomes constructively is challenging, though highly skilled individuals may find ways to make it useful. Personally, I believe safer and more reliable alternatives exist and are a better option. What are your thoughts?