@Santos Bonacci I am trying to find documented evidence for this, but so far this is what I have come up with Tropical vs. Sidereal Zodiac — What Actually Happened - The split between the two zodiacs is a purely **astronomical** effect of Earth's axial precession (~1° every 72 years). The two systems coincided around the early 3rd century CE and have since drifted ~23–24° apart. - Western astrology adopted the tropical zodiac via Ptolemy's Tetrabiblos (2nd c. CE) and used it predominantly by the 8th–9th century CE. Indian (Vedic/Jyotish) astrology kept the sidereal zodiac because of its indigenous Nakshatra (fixed-star) system — "it never had a Ptolemy." This divergence was settled centuries before the Jesuits even existed (the order was founded in 1540). - The claim that Jesuits went into India and switched the zodiac to stop people linking temple science to astrology has zero documentary support. Roberto de Nobili (the canonical Jesuit in South India, Madurai mission 1606–1656) is documented as a Sanskrit/Tamil scholar — with no connection to astronomy, astrology, the zodiac, or calendar reform. - The 1582 Gregorian calendar reform (Pope Gregory XIII) was an ecclesiastical fix for the date of Easter — restoring the equinox to ~March 21 as at the Council of Nicaea (325 CE). It was not a redefinition of the zodiac, though esoteric teachers often present it as one. Does anyone have points to counter the above information? Thank you for your Time

Click HERE to watch the replay of his presentaiton. Now in this installment, we are going to start going over the major holidays that are celebrated by various different cultures that you'll find seem to "coincidently" correspond to specific points/dates on the ecliptic. Now of course this is not coincidence that these holidays are celebrated on these days, because if you follow the and study the ecliptic it'll show you exactly why they celebrated, and of course how they are celebrated. [As an added note, make sure to check out the two videos linked below as this presentation is heavily based on those two videos] LINKS SHARED IN VIDEO 'Gospel of the Stars', SACRAMENTO - NOV 2nd 2019 Part 1: santos bonacci "The Holy Days" santos bonacci: Leicester; 25th august 2013, part 1

Click HERE to watch the replay of the lecture As done many, many, MANY, times in previous presentations in the past both here and in other platforms, one of the most important things one needs to learn is "the Wave", or as it is also known as "The Ecliptic". As stated in the first part, much of this will be very well known by experienced syncretists, and they will know the importance of this. But for all you who have just recently begun to study this, knowing and understanding the Wave is what will allow you to understand all things, especially for Syncretism. If you want to know how the Universe works, you MUST know the Wave.

After reading Forbidden Archeology by Michael Cremo many years ago, and how he is pointing to the Vedic scriptures that tell us that atomically homo sapiens sapiens have been here for many millions of years, and how the Vedas talk about the cycles of Brahmas in/out breaths in the great lengths of time, which I think are actual historical records of human history. From my limited research Vedic Astrology has its beginnings from this astrologer. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aryabhata Even though he and lots of ancient indian calendrical events & rituals are linked to solstices and equinoxes, the question becomes…. My question is if the Vedas have such a great grasp on the human historical record and the time cycles of the universe, how did Vedic astrology get it so wrong?

Hello to All!