Looking for people's opinions on something - please speak up. I am blessed to have a handful of high-end professionals that I can discuss AI with. I suppose I use them to help me sharpen my growing spiel for AI, and they likely trust that they are learning something along the way. There is a part where I want to guide them into a place where it is obvious to them that sometimes an LLM alone cannot provide a full level of expertise, and people will have to augment the LLM. Here is the example I use. I say, quite honestly, that I would 100% trust an AI to give me a few home exercises for my two 10lb weights, as an ankle sprain is keeping me from running. I trust any LLM to summarize that for me from the LLM's transformer training. Then I say that I think it is obvious that a third year NBA player would be crazy to ask an LLM, 'I am a third year NBA player going into the final year of my rookie contract. Please give me a summer workout plan before training camp starts in the fall.' - well, maybe not crazy to ask, but crazy to follow that advice without any other input from trainers, his NBA team, etc. It is supposed to be a fun example that guides the conversation into what do you or your company do that is unique and to begin the discussion about methods to add their expertise into their operations. And it worked a few times, until tonight. A high end real estate executive asked me, 'don't you trust an AI to summarize a workout plan for an NBA player?' I thought the answer was an obvious no... but perhaps, live and learn?? I guess I am asking for advice on two things. (1) Do people trust an AI to give an NBA player a workout plan. And (2) How do I fix my example/spiel. I don't want to talk about NBA athletes. My desire is to get people to talk about what they do that is unique and how AI (okay, ICM) can help them. I don't mind a bit of failure, but failing twice in one sentence has lead me here to ask for advice.

Im one of those people who need a project to properly learn a new skill like all this icm and folder methodology. Im a relatively new to AI but not python or technology. I’ve been in the VoIP space for over 20 years. Any suggestions on something I could build or help anyone out with so I can get fullly immersed into this system ?

This post is not for the ICM pro, there will be no talk of gates, scripts, or orchestration! This is for the person just starting out! @Karli Rosario Yes, I mean you! (And anyone else who may just be starting out with ICM) Seriously, I'm glad you found ICM. Let me give you the simplest version of it I know. ICM is a system of structured folders. Yes, the same folders you have been using on a computer for most of your life. The ones you stored photos in, & pirated music from Napster and LimeWire. That's it. I will take you through the process below. When working with AI, a lot of people are doing this 👇 You take a long prompt, feed the entire thing to AI at the beginning of your interaction, and spend time going back and forth with AI trying to get the outcome you want. (I'm not coming for you Karli, you are exceptionally good at this, but ICM will make your outcomes exceptionally better!) What is different about AI and prompting with ICM 👇 You take that same really long prompt and instead of giving it to the AI all at once in the beginning, you break it into steps, and each step gets its own folder, each folder gets its own piece of your large prompt, just 1 step from it, and you ordered the folders by when the steps happen in the workflow. You got it? Good 😊 ❤️‍🔥 -------------------Still a bit unclear, let's bake a cake. 💡 Here's an analogy I have success with (I picked this up way back in my VB programming days): Imagine teaching AI to bake a birthday cake. 🎂 The way most people do it: 👇 One giant prompt. "Bake a cake, here's the recipe, the frosting technique, the decorating style, the candle placement..." Then they hit enter and wait. The AI is juggling 40 instructions at once, and by step 30 it's forgotten step 3. The ICM way: 👇 Break the prompt/workflow into steps. Each step gets a folder. The first folder is your first step. Then you point the AI at the first step, and the first step is 00-birthday-cake: (Point the AI just means giving access to the folders to the AI, through uploading or direct local access, don't worry about that now, let's keep building our cake.)

I've been using Claude exclusively for a few months now. Started with openclaw, but that's a whole other story... I'm considering switching to antigravity. Gonna test it out tonight but wanted to see what you guys think about it as far as reliability and coding, etc Any direction is appreciated.

I recently finished a rewrite of a coding process. My Video game project, (the main thing I have been using as AI learning project) I have put on hold for now because I needed it. So here I am. With the Learning/Creative itch not being satisfied. It is definitely not being fulfilled at my job. I feel like taking on something ICM related and nothing is coming to me. Writer's block. So hear is the call. 🙃WHAT IS YOUR CRAZY IDEA?☣️ Throw out a crazy idea! Keep to one or two sentences. Let's inspire each other.