SAM is Live: Autonomous TDD Agents for Your Projects I'm excited to share something I've been building: SAM (Smart Agent Manager) - an autonomous TDD agent system that runs on Claude Code and Cursor. --- WHAT IS SAM? SAM is a team of specialized AI agents that transform your PRD into working, tested code. The key difference? Tests come first. Always. Here's the agent lineup: • Atlas - System Architect (validates your PRD) • Titan - Test Architect (writes failing tests - the RED phase) • Dyna - Developer (writes code to pass tests - the GREEN phase) • Argus - Code Reviewer (improves code quality - the REFACTOR phase) • Sage - Technical Writer (generates documentation) • Iris - UX Designer (validates user experience) SAM orchestrates them all, handing off work between agents as your feature moves through the pipeline. --- WHY TDD-FIRST MATTERS Most AI coding tools write code first, then maybe add tests later. We've all seen the result: code that works until it doesn't, bugs that slip through, refactoring that breaks things. SAM flips this. Titan writes the failing tests based on your acceptance criteria. Only then does Dyna write the minimal code to make them pass. Argus reviews and improves. The result? Code that's tested from the start. --- GETTING STARTED Installation takes one command: npx sam-agents You'll get an interactive prompt to choose your platform: 1) Claude Code - Uses /sam: slash commands 2) Cursor - Uses @agent mentions 3) Both - Install for all platforms No API keys needed. No additional costs. SAM runs on your existing Claude or Cursor subscription. --- WHAT'S IN v0.1.2 • Simpler install - Just "npx sam-agents" (we dropped the @ scope) • Interactive setup - Choose your IDE when you run it • Multi-platform - Same agents work in Claude Code and Cursor • Full TDD pipeline - RED-GREEN-REFACTOR orchestration --- TRY IT OUT 1. Navigate to any project folder 2. Run: npx sam-agents 3. Pick your platform 4. Start with /sam:core:workflows:autonomous-tdd (Claude) or @sam-tdd (Cursor)

I used to avoid closing Claude Code. Not because I was done — because I didn't want to lose all the context. Explaining the project again. Re-sharing the files. Starting from scratch. Then I found this command /resume. It shows your past conversations. Pick one. You're back exactly where you left off. Tiny feature. Massive time saver. What's a tool shortcut you wish you learned earlier?

You know that feeling. You prompt Claude or Cursor, code just appears. You ship a landing page in 20 minutes. It feels like magic. Then week 2 happens: 1. You need to add user auth 2. But wait - where does this even go? 3. The code you vibe-coded has no real structure 4. AI throws out three different ways to do it 5. You pick one. It sort of works but breaks something else Now you're trying to debug code you didn't actually write in a codebase you didn't really design. Here's the thing - vibe coding isn't the problem. It's great for quick prototypes and trying things out. The problem is using it for real features that need to last. That's where spec coding helps. Take 15 minutes to write out what you're building. Sketch the architecture. Be clear about requirements. Then when AI generates the code, it's consistent. It makes sense. And when bugs show up - because they will - you actually know where to look. What's your take? Still loving vibe coding or starting to feel the pain?

Kindly refrain from self promotion in this group. We will remove anyone who keeps self promoting on a daily basis.

We are changing the scope of this community to Spec Coding and not just n8n Automation. If you have any feedback or opinion please let us know.