Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
What is this?
Less
More

Owned by Rebecca

The Enforcement Academy

32 members • $39/month

T.E.A. offers elite Consumer Law education. Here you can learn dispute strategy, enforcement systems & litigation frameworks. Knowledge a SUPERPOWER!

Memberships

32 contributions to The Enforcement Academy
Class Appreciation
CLASS WAS AMAZING TODAY FOREVER GRATEFUL THANK YOU FOR YOUR PATIENCE REBECCA CANT WAIT TILL IM ABLE TO EXPRESS MYSELF AND EVERYTHING IM LEARNING FLUENTLY AND EFFORTLESSLY 💯🤏🏾 #INSPIRED
0 likes • 5d
Can't wait to see you flourish.
Hey Enforcers
Weekly check in post. How is everyone? I hope everyone's week has been productive. Just a reminder that Module 8 is now live. Please review the presentation before Saturday's live call ; jot your questions down and See you guys soon.
1 like • 5d
@Cj Contreras that's awesome!
1 like • 5d
@Samantha W It's a power point presentation. There was no sound.
Consumer Protection Act Nugget
I know that we are currently studying FCRA. However , a lot of you have third parties reporting on your credit reports. That said , that is an attempt to collect a debt by them reporting the account on your reports so anything they report must comply with FCRA and FDCPA. Which means that they may not use unreasonable meanings to misrepresent the debt to you either, solely for the collection of it. Here is some case law to help you better understand. Under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the test is not whether "a reasonable consumer" would be deceived, misled or harrassed by the prohibited practices because the Act is intended to protect "unsophisticated consumers." Therefore, this Court must look not only at the "reasonable consumer," but also to a less sophisticated consumer in determining whether the debt collection practices act has a tendency or capacity to deceive. Jeter v. Credit Bureau, 760 F.2d 1168, 1172-73 (11th Cir. 1985); Baker v. G.C. Services, 677 F.2d 775, 778 (9th Cir.1982).[3] See also Bingham v. Collection Bureau, Inc., 505 F. Supp. 864, 870 (N.D.Dak.1981); Wright v. Credit Bureau of Georgia, Inc., 548 F. Supp. 591, 599 (N.D.Ga.1982), reconsidered, 555 F. Supp. 1005, 1007 (N.D.Ga.1983); Rutyna v. Collections Accounts Terminal, Inc., 478 F. Supp. 980, 982 (N.D.Ill. 1979). Contra Blackwell v. Professional Business Services of Georgia, 526 F. Supp. 535, 537-538 (N.D.Ga.1981).
1
0
Recording of today's live session
If you haven't caught one of the live sessions yet you're missing out! Tap In!
Recording of today's live session
1-10 of 32
Rebecca Symone
4
34points to level up
@rebecca-andrews-8607
Teaching consumers how to defend their rights, fight debt collectors, and win with the law!

Active 6h ago
Joined Feb 12, 2026
Powered by