Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

Digitally Demented

20 members • Free

9 contributions to Digitally Demented
Tiago Forte just validated everything you're building.
If you follow the PKM (Personal Knowledge Management) world at all, you probably saw this: Tiago Forte — Building a Second Brain, 1M+ followers — just announced something he’s calling “Personal Context Management.” He’s launching an “AI Second Brain” cohort around the idea that your personal knowledge system needs to become the context layer for AI. Sound familiar? I’m not saying this to gloat. I’m saying it because this matters for you. When someone with Tiago’s reach tells a million people that the future is organizing your thinking so AI can actually use it — that’s not competition. That’s air cover. He just did millions of dollars worth of market education for the exact problem we’re solving. The difference is in what happens next. Tiago is selling a cohort. You’re building architecture. A cohort ends. You get frameworks, maybe some templates, and then you’re on your own. What you’re building here — CLAUDE.md files, agent systems, handoff protocols, the whole cognitive architecture — that compounds. Every session makes it smarter. Every agent learns your context better. Every workflow you design becomes infrastructure you own. Tiago’s cohort will teach people to organize context for AI. You’re already deploying it. Here’s the strategic play for this week. I’m publishing LinkedIn content that rides this wave — connecting what Tiago announced to what cognitive architecture actually looks like in practice. The timing is perfect. I need your help amplifying it. The post is up now - https://www.linkedin.com/posts/danielwalters_cognitivearchitecture-aiworkflow-activity-7441923448932765696-e7VH 1. Like them (algorithm fuel) 2. Comment with your own experience (social proof that isn’t me talking about me) 3. Share if it resonates (extends reach beyond my network) This isn’t vanity metrics. When a million people just got told “personal context management is the future,” and our community is already doing it — we want to be visible in that conversation.
0 likes • 2h
We shaved 5-7 minutes off the substance use assessments process, while also increasing quality and positively impacting assessor job satisfaction. This small change implemented across 150 plus assessments a month should result in more clients seen, lower assessor burnout, and improved client outcomes!
90% of people using AI are using it wrong — and it's not their fault.
Harvard Business Review just published one of the most important AI studies I've seen. They tracked 2,500 employees at KPMG over 8 months. Analyzed 1.4 million AI prompts. The finding: 90% adopted AI. Only 5% use it with any sophistication. That's not a training problem. KPMG already trained these people. They had access, they had tools, they had support. And still — 85% of them are basically using a Ferrari to drive to the mailbox. Here's what surprised me most: how often you use AI has almost nothing to do with how well you use it. The "just use it more" advice is dead. The study killed it with data. The 5% who actually get results? Four things set them apart: 1. They treat AI as a reasoning partner, not a search engine 2. They delegate complex, multi-step tasks — not one-off questions 3. They define roles, constraints, and success criteria before they prompt 4. They use AI as a general-purpose thinking tool across their whole job — not just for writing emails And here's the part that matters for everyone in this community: the sophisticated users were almost all experienced professionals. Not the youngest people in the room. Not the most "tech-savvy." The people with the deepest understanding of their work. Your experience IS the advantage. Contextual range — knowing what good looks like because you've seen bad — is what makes AI actually useful. AI doesn't replace your judgment. It amplifies it. But only if you know how to think with it, not just use it. The 85% gap isn't going to close with better prompts or more YouTube tutorials. It's going to close when people stop treating AI as a tool and start treating it as an extension of how they think. That's what we're building here. **What's your experience?** Are you in the 5%, the 85%, or somewhere in between? And what do you think is actually holding most people back?
0 likes • 2h
I'm definitely somewhere in between with the goal of being in the 5%. Knowing what to delegate and what not to delegate holds me back right now. My hope is to clarify that, implement solutions, and spend more time thinking, cultivating, curating, and editing AI output.
Nobody talks about AI habits
Everyone talks about AI tools. Nobody talks about AI habits. Which model to use. Which plugin to install. Which framework to follow. But the people actually getting results? They built habits, not just workflows. They have a morning check-in with their AI. They have a shutdown routine where they log what happened. They default to AI for specific task types without thinking about it — the way you default to Google for a search. The tool doesn't matter if you only open it when you "remember to." The habit layer is where AI goes from "sometimes useful" to "how did I work without this?" What's one AI habit you've built — or one you want to build but haven't yet?
1 like • 5d
@Loxley Browne I missed this first time around... but love this. Would love to see your prompt.
Connected Intelligence is live. Founding member spots at $297.
Before I get into the details — thank you. Some of you paid before a single module was finished. Some of you joined because I asked you to poke holes in something I was building. Either way, you showed up before there was anything to show up for, and I don't take that lightly. This community exists because of the people in this room. That's not a tagline. It's just true. The course is officially "live". All 5 modules have comprehensive text guides with exercises, frameworks, and a 13-template workbook. Video walkthroughs are being added module by module — founding members get every update as it ships. Here's what it is, what you get, and why I'm offering a founding member price. The short version: Connected Intelligence: AI Fluency is a 5-module course for non-technical professionals who've tried AI and know they're not getting what's possible. You'll build your own cognitive architecture -- a deliberate system for how you think, decide, and operate with AI, designed around your actual work. Self-paced, and every module produces a deliverable you keep. What you'll build: 1. AI Opportunity Matrix -- Your actual work tasks categorized by what AI should handle, assist with, and never touch. 2. Master Prompt -- A portable context document that makes AI stop treating you like a stranger. 3. Prompt Playbook -- 5+ prompts built for YOUR job, not generic templates. 4. Personal Tool Stack -- Which AI for which task, based on a decision framework that won't expire next month. 5. Personal AI Framework Map -- The mental model that ties it all together. The founding member deal: **Founding Member**: $297 one-time (20 spots) — Full course access, all future updates, video walkthroughs added as they ship, your feedback directly shapes what's next. **Standard** (after founding spots fill): $497 one-time — Full course access, all videos included. No subscription. No annual renewal. Pay once, you're in. Why the discount is real: I'm not manufacturing scarcity. The founding member price is lower because you're betting on something new. I don't have 500 testimonials or a waitlist of 10,000 people. What I have is 15+ years in the field, a 19-agent AI system running my business, and a course I spent months building because I watched too many smart people struggle with AI for the wrong reasons.
1 like • 6d
Excited to be on board! Thank you Daniel.
What are you working on this week?
Quick check-in. What’s on your plate this week — and is AI touching any of it? I’ll go first. I had 9 meetings this week that I recorded. Consulting calls, coaching sessions, networking conversations. Every one of them produced action items, follow-ups, commitments, and details I need to remember months from now. Old me would’ve spent the rest of the week replaying recordings and scribbling notes. Instead, I ran them through a transcription and debrief pipeline — and had structured outputs for every single call in under an hour. Commitments tracked. Follow-up emails drafted. Client files updated. The meetings were the work. The processing wasn’t — that’s the system’s job now. Your turn. What are you working on? Doesn’t have to involve AI — but if it does, I want to hear what’s working and what’s not.
1 like • 10d
We’re working to streamline the substance use assessment process, from the initial client encounter to the completed documentation and sent referrals. The goal is to enhance assessment quality and process consistency across assessors, reduce the time spent per assessment, and increase assessor engagement. I’ve been running the process, blank assessments, and documentation through ChatGPT and Claude, and I believe we can successfully implement the changes early next week.
1 like • 10d
I used Zoom's note taking capabilities during a couple interviews recently and was blown away with the organization and accuracy. Took me about 5 minutes total to tweak each 30 minute meeting notes. Are you recording any in person meetings?
1-9 of 9
Paul Harbin
2
9points to level up
@paul-harbin-5015
Birmingham-based builder of human-centered behavioral healthcare systems | Former NCAA Division I Head Coach

Active 57m ago
Joined Feb 25, 2026
Powered by