@Pierre-Henry Isidor How's the project coming along?

@Pierre-Henry Isidor Amazing! Thanks for sharing!

Coming from 13 years in aviation here... During my first human factors training, we were taught the 80/20 rule. As air travel initially began to increase in popularity, 80% of the crashes were machine related, and 20% were human error. As technology advanced (materials, CAD, FEA, training, ...) the tables turned. 80% of errors are human errors and 20% machine...I'm sure it's even less than 20% in today's day and age. Accidents are always the result (output) of a "chain of events". A series of events which eventually lead to an accident. Companies install safeguards through training, technology, policies, etc. in an attempt to break any one of those chain links before an accident occurs. Aircraft systems are already highly advanced (autopilot, synthetic vision, ...) and is totally feasible to integrate Ai. I believe Boeing has already been hard at work in that regards. As @Pierre-Henry Isidor said, FAA/ EASA/ CARS will likely require at least 1 human to supervise.

@Marvin Diebel It would be interesting to see AI run wiring, plumbing for homes, or maintain aircraft for example. I believe trades be the last to be replaced. However anything digital within those trades (for the businesses/ business owners) could be automated or improved at the very least.