Honestly I wasn’t sure I’d share this post. Last February, I had an idea and I set myself a crazy goal. I started with £1,000 and gave myself one year to try to turn it into a profit with AI… Honestly? I knew it could get messy, but I wanted to see what could happen if I used AI to help me trade. Since February, I became obsessed with quant trading. I spent dozens of hours studying the research methods and risk rules used by quant traders at major hedge funds, and applying those principles to my own trading. Then I started translating those quant principles into instructions and systems that AI could carry out… A lot of those hours were me learning from my mistakes. But some of the AI systems worked better than I hoped. Because when I got my agents properly educated, and running? My system bought dips perfectly, even when the rest of the market was having a rough time. And a lot of those trades happened while I was asleep. But I also realized how incredibly hard it was to manage all these systems with a market that’s constantly changing. One day, my system missed a trade because the server did not run as it should. I realized these agents needed more than a smart trading idea. I needed to guarantee they could run at the right time. While a lot of people are outsourcing their thinking to AI, I did the opposite. I gave it my best ideas. It executed. Suddenly I saw tens of thousands of pounds in profit. If you want trading to happen while you sleep, it requires more brains, not less. You need to test it, watch it, and have strong safety rules in place. That got me thinking. What if there was a much easier way to take an idea, turn it into clear trading rules, test it with real market data, and see if it could be trusted? So you can utilize the math that generates me consistent profits, without having to spend all that time in front of your computer. What if you could do all of that without writing any of your own code? What if you could use those quant principles through AI, drawing on the trial and error behind my own 180k result?

Who watched/attended live THE BIG EVENT by Lewis? I think this community could give some honest feedback. 💰What were the expectations? 🤖What were the thoughts during the event? 👉🏼Have you stayed till the end? What do you think overall about Louis' big event?😉 Let's be transparent. I think that feedback, good or bad, is always valuable for the creator themselves.

Highlighted a few inconsistencies. I will be running this prompt again sometime in the future if I change my setup in case I refine the processes and make some efficiency alternations.

I have a Personal Claude.md file now.

Read my own SOP back as if I'd never met myself. Found 24 gaps in a document I'd spent six days writing. Two patterns did most of the damage. Contradictions from my own edits. Day 36 tightened a threshold. Day 37 changed a rule. Day 38 moved a deadline. Every time the later section was right — and the earlier one still said the old thing. Six of those. An agent reading top to bottom hits the stale version first. Steps that never existed. My outputs section described a screenshot. My error handling described a sync failure. Neither had a step that produced them. Six missing steps, invisible until I traced backwards. The check that caught them: for every output and every failure mode, ask which numbered step produces this? If you can't point at one, it doesn't happen. One more, and it stung: two tools reported success on things that hadn't happened — including my own symbol search returning 15 results, which I read as "doesn't exist." It did exist. A negative finding needs the same verification as a positive one.