My first client has a database of 2000 past contacts, I offered the first month free so he could have proof that this works with no risk from him, I want to reactivate enough people so he knows it works but at the same time I want to space them out so I can keep him for a few months. So the question is, how many of his contacts should I try to reactivate in the first month.

Rejection Category: CALL_TO_ACTION Explanation: Rejection Code 2121: Invalid Call To Action - The opt-in form must provide instructions on how to find privacy policy. Rejection Code 2117: Invalid Call To Action - The opt-in form must include information on how a customer can receive help. Rejection Code 2116: Invalid Call To Action - The opt-in form has no disclosure that message and data rates will apply to messages sent. Rejection Code 2115: Invalid Call To Action - The opt-in form must mention message frequency. Main issue: Automated CNP review sometimes throws false-negative rejections (2115/2116/2117/2121/7103) even when your form and privacy policy are fully compliant. A common root cause: the automated reviewer is a bot/crawler — it gets blocked by CAPTCHA, bot-detection, or JS-heavy rendering, so it never actually sees your disclosures. It then reports them as missing. Resubmitting the same campaign without changing anything just re-triggers the same automated check — it loops. Proactive fix, in order: 1. Check if your form blocks bots — CAPTCHA, Cloudflare bot protection, or client-side JS rendering of required text can all prevent the automated reviewer from reading your disclosures, even though a human visiting the page sees them fine 2. Re-elect the CNP in TCR (re-select the same carrier as connectivity partner) 3. Re-import the campaign into the carrier's portal right after re-election 4. Open a support ticket immediately, not after waiting for another rejection. State plainly: form/policy already meets all flagged requirements, automated reviewer may be bot-blocked or failing to render JS content, request manual vetting review instead of automated re-check Had this exact pattern with Bandwidth as the CNP — automated check threw 5 false-negative codes, manual review (triggered via re-election + ticket escalation) cleared it within a week with zero changes to the OptInFix form itself.

Hey everyone! Just joined the community and based in Ottawa Canada. I run a done-for-you missed call SMS recovery service for local trades and service businesses (electricians, HVAC, plumbers, salons) built on GHL. My A2P campaign has been rejected 3 times with error code 30909 — CTA verification issue. Here's my problem: my consent model doesn't fit the standard framework. The flow is simple — end user calls a local business, nobody answers, they get an automated text back within seconds. There's no web form because the customer never visits a website. They just called. I can't add a "reply YES first" step because trades customers will just call the next business on Google. It defeats the whole purpose. My questions for anyone who's solved this: 1. Have you gotten A2P approved for a missed call text back use case where there's no web form opt-in? 2. What opt-in method did you select and what did you write in the consent description? 3. Did registering under a different use case category make a difference? 4. Is toll free verification an easier path for this specific use case? Any help massively appreciated 🙏

Has anyone built a custom user interface on top of GoHighLevel where the dashboard and user experience are completely unique to their product, but GoHighLevel is still powering everything underneath the hood? I’ve been exploring the idea of vibe-coding a custom dashboard with a different look and feel so it doesn’t resemble the standard GoHighLevel experience. GHL has become incredibly powerful, but because it’s also becoming much more widely used, I’m interested in effectively “reskinning” it so the frontend feels like a proprietary platform rather than an obvious GHL implementation. Has anyone done this successfully? If so, what architecture or approach did you use? Custom frontend + APIs? Embedded widgets? White-label SaaS mode with heavy customization? Any insight would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.

When running a DR. During the A2P verification, the website has to follow a strict checklist. Are you guys getting access to their existing site and editing it to be compliant or making your own placeholder site?