Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

GHL Money Labs

283 members • Free

GHL University

352 members • Free

GoHighLevel w/ Robb Bailey

12.9k members • Free

AI Automation Agency Hub

315.3k members • Free

AI Automation Society

357.2k members • Free

6 contributions to GoHighLevel w/ Robb Bailey
A2P and Website
When running a DR. During the A2P verification, the website has to follow a strict checklist. Are you guys getting access to their existing site and editing it to be compliant or making your own placeholder site?
1 like • 4d
@Tanya Ferguson Here is a live example of what the hosted page looks like — optinfix.com/embed/f70adf24-e58b-4070-92f7-489b96005249 That is exactly what gets submitted to TCR as the consent URL. Publicly accessible, compliant language built in, branded per client. Each sub-account gets its own version automatically. DM me if you want to see the full setup for your clients.
0 likes • 1d
Hey @Tanya Ferguson Glad the example was helpful. If you want to see how the full setup works for your clients I am happy to walk you through it. Takes about 10 minutes. Just DM me when you are ready.
Quick question for agencies doing A2P for multiple clients
For those of you managing 10DLC for 20+ sub-accounts, What is your current process for the consent URL step? Specifically how are you handling the hosted opt-in page that TCR reviewers need to verify. Are you editing the client's website each time, building a separate landing page, or something else?
0
0
DBR Consent
For those of you doing reactivation via SMS, how are you handling TCPA compliance? Are you getting prior express written consent before texting or relying or he existing business relationship argument. Also how are you getting A2P 10DLC approved when the contacts haven’t explicitly opted into SMS?
0 likes • 4d
@Josh Waring This is exactly why we built OptInFix. Getting client website access is a slow, dev pushback, and your campaign sitting in draft the whole time. What works better: a hosted consent page that lives outside their website entirely. Separate URL, fully TCR-compliant language, branded per client. Reviewers can verify it instantly without touching the client's site. Here is a live example of what it looks like: optinfix.com/embed/f70adf24-e58b-4070-92f7-489b96005249 Takes 60 seconds to generate per sub-account after connecting to GHL. happy to show you the full setup. DM me.
A2P approved for missed call text back — implied consent — anyone solved this?
Hey everyone! Just joined the community and based in Ottawa Canada. I run a done-for-you missed call SMS recovery service for local trades and service businesses (electricians, HVAC, plumbers, salons) built on GHL. My A2P campaign has been rejected 3 times with error code 30909 — CTA verification issue. Here's my problem: my consent model doesn't fit the standard framework. The flow is simple — end user calls a local business, nobody answers, they get an automated text back within seconds. There's no web form because the customer never visits a website. They just called. I can't add a "reply YES first" step because trades customers will just call the next business on Google. It defeats the whole purpose. My questions for anyone who's solved this: 1. Have you gotten A2P approved for a missed call text back use case where there's no web form opt-in? 2. What opt-in method did you select and what did you write in the consent description? 3. Did registering under a different use case category make a difference? 4. Is toll free verification an easier path for this specific use case? Any help massively appreciated 🙏
0 likes • 8d
Congrats on the pilot client! Yes, each client needs their own brand registration in TCR. Your agency account is just the container, every client registers under their own legal name and EIN. ISV path exists but it is overkill for where you are right now. On the 3 rejections, delete it and start completely fresh. Do not try to edit and resubmit the same campaign. Three 30909 rejections means it is flagged and reviewers will be harder on it regardless of what you change. New client brand registration, new campaign, clean slate. DM me when the pilot client is ready and I will get the OptInFix consent URL set up same day.
0 likes • 4d
Hey @Raghda El-Abdallah , just checking in! Did you get a chance to set up the pilot client? Happy to get the OptInFix consent URL ready for you if you want to move forward. Takes 10 minutes and I can walk you through it. 😊
Why “opted_in = true” will not save you
Noticed something while going through a few GHL setups recently… Most systems just store: opted_in = true Which feels fine on the surface. But if you actually try to trace back how that consent was captured, it gets a bit unclear. Like: What exact message did the user agree to? When did they submit it? Was there a checkbox or just a form submit? In most cases, that detail isn’t really stored anywhere. And honestly, it works… until you need to verify something. Not saying everyone needs a complex setup, but having at least some basic tracking of important details makes things a lot cleaner later. Curious how others here are handling this — are you storing full consent details or just basic opt-in status?
0
0
Why “opted_in = true” will not save you
1-6 of 6
Nirav M
1
4points to level up
@nirav-bharatkumar-2816
10DLC & TCPA compliance specialist helping businesses get approved, stay compliant, and avoid costly SMS violations.

Active 7h ago
Joined Apr 27, 2026
Powered by