@Paulo Costa, The Roaster I think @Aimee Jardon may have put her finger on something here with “What work?” Because the more I think about it, I’m not really coming here to POST something. I’m coming because I want a second pair of eyes on what I made before I send it out into the world 😄 That’s why “POST THE WORK” may be slightly off. I’d be curious to test: CHECK BEFORE IT GOES LIVE. or, with almost no change to your current version: CHECK WHAT YOU BUILT. Then keep “I’LL TAG RELEVANT REVIEWERS” underneath, because that part is strong and explains why this group is useful. Feels a little closer to the real benefit for me - catch something I missed before my audience does 🔥

@Paulo Costa, The Roaster yes, now I see why you want to keep POST there. If people are still asking how to actually get roasted, then the mechanic probably needs to win over clever copy here 😄 And thinking about your current version again, I actually prefer: POST WHAT YOU BUILT. I’LL TAG RELEVANT REVIEWERS. over “POST YOUR WORK.” “What you built” feels more concrete to me. I’ve made something, I’m not sure it’s ready yet, so I put that version here for another pair of eyes before I make the final call. That feels very close to what actually happens in the group 🔥

Good one - here goes mine :) 🔴 Standard (FREE): Start with your About Page Audit, roadmap and practical tools to see what to fix first and start building toward your first/next 3-5 high-ticket clients. 🔵 Premium ($67/month): Turn the roadmap into action with deeper training, unlimited audits, implementation support and the MVP path to help you land 3-5 high-ticket clients in 90 days. 🟢 VIP ($1,597/year): Get the full OBB1 system, 4W Community Growth Sprint, DFY community optimization and priority support when you want more hands-on help building it faster. 👉 https://www.skool.com/navigator/about I like this - one sentence forces you to focus on the outcome, not the shopping list 😄

@Dar Brown yes - exactly. That’s a really good real-world example of what I was trying to get at 👍 Going from “all things foodie” > home canner gives people a much faster reason to say, “this is for me.” @Gwynne Conlyn I think that’s the key decision before building too much around the new direction - who is the first person this cookbook offer is really for? A professional wanting to monetise expertise and a home cook wanting to preserve family recipes may both want a cookbook, but the reason they buy help is very different. Dar’s example is a good reminder that being more specific can make the right people notice themselves faster. 😊

@Gwynne Conlyn :)

@Warrick Duncan 👋 A lot of the thread has already covered proof and trust, so I’d go after something slightly different. -- ✅ What I’d keep: The “minimal effective dose” + 10-minute home workout idea. That feels like the real mechanism behind AbLab. It gives busy people a reason to believe this is different from another fitness program asking them to train harder, longer, and overhaul their whole life. I’d actually lean into that more over time. -- 🧪 What I’d test first: Make the page run on one clear promise + one clear clock. Right now I’m seeing: “the easiest way to get abs fast!” “visible abs in 60 days” “complete 7 day challenge” and: “get a 6 pack the easy way” Each makes sense on its own, but together I have to work out which one is the actual transformation and which one is just the first milestone. If 60 days is the main promise you’re comfortable standing behind, I’d test something closer to: “Get visible abs in 60 days with 10-minute home workouts.” Then make the other timeframe clearly the entry point: “Start with the 7-Day Ab Challenge.” Not necessarily those exact words, but I’d separate: main transformation = 60 days first quick win = 7-day challenge mechanism = 10-minute minimal-effective-dose workouts That would make the whole offer easier to understand in a few seconds. You already have a strong core idea here - I’d mainly make sure the promise is running on one clock instead of three. 🐬

@Warrick Duncan 👋

@Matt Wilson 👋 I think your strongest sales line is currently doing CTA duty when it should probably be doing headline duty 😄 -- ✅ What I’d keep: This line: “Stop relying on chord charts and learn to master a full set of tunes from memory.” That’s the clearest transformation on the page for me. “Learn tunes” and “master the fretboard” are good, but this makes the problem much easier to picture: I can play when the chart is in front of me... but I don’t really own the tune yet. And the result is practical too - build a repertoire you actually know well enough to play with other musicians. -- 🧪 What I’d test first: Move that problem + outcome right to the top and make the player it’s for a little clearer. Right now you open with: “Learn to play through your favourite standards by following a simple progressive pathway through the tunes.” Clear enough, but it doesn’t immediately tell me what frustration I’m escaping or whether this is meant for my current level. I’d test something in the direction of: “For jazz guitarists who know the basics but still rely on chord charts - build a setlist of standards you can play from memory, improvise over and confidently play with others.” Then The Songs + The Shed + Bebop 101 become the method that gets me there. Not necessarily those exact words, but I’d make chart dependence > owning the tunes > playing freely the story the visitor understands in the first few seconds. -- 🐬 This is only the Short Review - one thing I’d keep + the first thing I’d test. The full audit goes through your About Page across 15 Copy + Visual checks, including your score, check-by-check breakdown, additional issues this Short Review doesn’t cover, and specific recommendations (example below) Your PAP (Personal Audit Page) then gives you the personalized summary, screenshots, #1 priority + 1st move, and full report in one place. Every new member gets this inside the free Standard tier of 🧭 OBB1 Community Navigator.