Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

Clief Notes

38.8k members โ€ข Free

4 contributions to Clief Notes
Quick Share
What is one quick thing that you wish you would have known the first time opening Claude code? Asking because I just opened Claude code myself about a month and a half ago. I figure this could become a discussion that helps newbies like me! :)
1 like โ€ข 16h
@Aaron Klein absolutely ICM, I am still going through the beginning courses on here. Although Iโ€™m not at all above asking the dumb questions because dumb questions lead to answers and lead to us all getting just a tad bit smarter lol
Your AI expert council is probably making worse decisions than a single prompt
Everyone's stacking AI experts into "councils" right now. Here's what nobody mentions: most of them produce blander advice than a single good prompt. I've been building multi-agent systems for a while, and the council pattern is seductive. Load six marketing legends, let them debate, synthesize the genius. Three things I learned the hard way: 1. Councils regress to the mean. Put Cialdini, Godin, and Vaynerchuk in a room and "synthesize" their answers and you get generic marketing advice wearing three nametags. The fix isn't a better synthesizer. Stop resolving the disagreement. Let the tension stand and make one agent own the call. 2. The debate is where your budget dies. Distilling a book into a tight skill file is cheap. Having agents argue in real time is not. If "minimal tokens" is your pitch, the preprocessing is doing the work and the roundtable is the luxury. 3. It doesn't make the model smarter. Cold Claude already does a soft version of all of this. What the structure buys you is named, sharp, predictable behavior. Say that honestly โ€” the moment you claim it makes the AI "smarter," you've oversold it. None of this means don't build councils. It means build them with your eyes open. The real test for any council: do your experts actually disagree, or do they just agree in different vocabulary? If it's the second, you built one expert and gave it six hats. (Riffing off the systems thread from @Curtis Hays that @David Vogel highlighted for us and the 'systems' build โ€” good work worth pressure-testing.)
1 like โ€ข 2d
@Gabriel Azoulay I like this. I use weighted models of data to calculate and measure my thoughts and then I make the decision based on that model, so Iโ€™m wondering if I can incorporate that into the ecosystem of the council idea.
0 likes โ€ข 19h
@Gabriel Azoulay great submission and congratulations on the win!
WEEK 7 COMPโš™๏ธ THE OPERATOR โ€” RESULTS
(and a small change to how we run these) Hello everyone!! ๐Ÿ‘‹ First, the honest bit. This one is landing later than Monday, and on purpose. Two things got us here. One, a lot more of you are submitting now. If I am going to really sit with every entry and give it a proper look, a weekend is not enough. This round I went through all of them, watched the videos, opened the repos, the full pass. That takes time and I would rather do it right than rush it. Two, I could feel a few of you running hot. Weekly is a sprint, and burnout was starting to creep in for some. So we are moving to bi-weekly. More room to build, more room to breathe, and the time for me to actually review the work the way it deserves. ๐ŸŽฅ Quick word on the videos. They were a step up this round. Some of the animated walkthroughs and live demos were a genuine pleasure to watch, and yes, I weigh them. A clean demo that shows the thing actually working makes a real difference. However I don't want that to ALWAYS be a requirement. Also you will notice the Heavy hitters that you usually see up here are not currently, some posted late and I decided to let the new entries and first timers also have a chance as well! But certainly, check the original post as every submission has something for you to learn from : ๐Ÿ’ฐ Competition 7 โž–โž–โž– ๐Ÿ› ๏ธ A FEW THAT STOOD OUT (in no order, and if you didn't make it, it doesn't mean yours wasn't great) The Pipeline Operator โ€” @Jayden Forshee Runs a whole sales pipeline. Paste a lead and it grades it, writes the outreach, and moves the card itself. The live board where you watch cards move on their own, sat right next to a normal chatbot, was one of the clearest ways anyone has shown what an operator actually is. https://github.com/griffainai/studio-pipeline-operator Board: https://pipeline-operator.vercel.app/board
2 likes โ€ข 19h
This is so cool, congratulations all! Iโ€™m definitely going to look at all of these GitHubโ€™s!
Who's here? Drop your intro.
Tell us three things: 1. What you do (job, industry, student, career-changer, whatever) 2. What brought you to Clief Notes 3. One thing you're trying to figure out right now related to computing or AI I'll respond to every single one. And read each other's intros too because the person who's stuck on the same problem as you might already be in this thread. I'll go first I am Jake, I have been working in tech for 15 Years, building with Generative AI for 3 Years straight now! Excited to teach and learn! That's it. Simple, scannable, gives you data on who's joining and what they need, and keeps the feed clear for content that retains people past week one.
0 likes โ€ข 2d
Hello everyone! I work as an information systems specialist for a non profit - I build technology initiatives and find ways to partner with SAAS companies and vendors to improve our company. 2 I found clief on YouTube and facebook while on this journey - 3 I have downloaded Claude code a few weeks ago and that led me on a journey of really trying to understand ai. My hope is to eventually work with ai more and switch to working on AI at some point.
1-4 of 4
Nathanael Cunningham
2
10points to level up
@nathanael-cunningham-3091
Tech Bro

Active 3h ago
Joined Jun 17, 2026
Powered by