A co-erarchy - two parents, or even just the idea that female and male sex organs exist and that shapes humans differently by nature just like everything else in nature(for lack of any knowledge to the contrary thus far in my life - 36 years….but of course open to learning and trying to do that hence this post so bear with my ignorance for as long as I live and learn which is until the day I die or become immortal and let you know what it’s like as an immortal…if I know everything or not after that achievement of nature occurs LOL) and they could learn to exist as a more powerful force than alone just by virtue of more physical and cognitive assets as well as productive power(why do we call it reproductive? We’re not reinventing ourselves we’re producing NEW life?) - which just makes sense to me, patriarchy and matriarchy, matriarchy and patriarchy - acronym either PAM or MAP….as a man…patriarchy makes me first think of wanting to have sex with a woman and PAM might be her name and then I’ll learn firsthand what it takes to be a patriarch. Matriarchy is woman first in leadership and MAP is our human on-and-from-earth design science database. Also, everyone comes from a woman. So…maybe it wasn’t Adam and Eve but cavewoman who was first to evolve superior leadership/survival intelligence as far as instinctual development went? Probably in this instance due to her maternal instinct and birthing pains being radical motivators men just don’t physically have? Women physically experience a transformation alongside life that men do not participate in directly other than seeing the down-the-road result of their intimacy while women experience it….aaahhhh!! Women experience it, men see it and support it. Hmmmmmm….Theories of analysis….. Wow….that seems like super harsh to me as a man….that a woman was in charge of humanity’s survival before she had a man to think with…..and let’s say it was the other way around(I experience this personally as far as survival capacity goes in my relationship….I saved her first as far as that goes)…..that’s still someone tapping into their understanding of basic survival toward a whole woman, not just looking at her like she’s a dumb monkey but actually valuing her. So the focus, to me, as a man, always ties back to desiring the complete good of a woman. Especially her feelings because if she feels anything is wrong and a man cannot help her, she’ll prefer her instincts to anything he suggests that cannot assist her in that endeavor, and that includes the deepest of intimacy, and not JUST in a survivable way….there needs be growth of intimacy. Stagnation of intimacy and all other forms of growth is not acceptable and is an instinctual signal to her of disease of body or untrustworthiness of mind. I suppose men also feel similarly.