If we’re looking to incorporate human needs, Maslow is rather limited and dated (1941). There are other approaches which are more relevant. The common representation of Maslow as a pyramidal hierarch doesn’t bear much scrutiny. Eg. “Physiological” needs (food, shelter, clothing) can only be met if a person is already embedded in social structures and relations; there’s a lot of self-actualisation in materially poor communities, and often not a lot of self-actualisation among the barbaric rich. Etc etc The focus of Maslow is also on individuals so perhaps fits better with neoclassical methodological individualism, and meeting needs by market mechanisms. There are lots of other suitable frameworks. For example, Max-Neef’s Human Scale Development (1991) is better embedded in social, ecological, political contexts etc; it has useful concepts concerning “poverties”. Max-Neef was a dissident development and ecological economist…. There’s a link to the book in Max-Neef’s Wikipedia entry.