I’m making intentional improvements to the AI ATM Machine community right now. Not surface-level tweaks. Not cosmetic updates. The actual experience of being inside this room. And the only way to do that well is with honest input from the people who are here. If you’ve spent any time in this community — posting, learning, or even just observing — I’d really value a straight, unfiltered review. Nothing fancy. Nothing long. Just: What’s been useful What’s confusing or unnecessary What you wish existed but doesn’t (yet) This takes 2–3 minutes max. As a thank-you, everyone who submits a review will unlock a free course: Claude Code for Business This is the exact foundation I’ve used to build $80K client applications in a single weekend — and it all started with what’s taught in this course. No theory. No fluff. Just how I actually use Claude to think, build, and execute fast. No upsell. No pitch. Just a clean exchange: feedback for value. If this community has helped you even a little, this is the best way to influence what we build next. 👇 Leave your review here: https://testimonial.to/anthony-haddad?form=ai-that-drives-success-client-impact-stories I read every submission. And they directly shape what comes next. Appreciate you being part of this.

The baby clone was fun. The Moon Man is just me having a good time with it. But here’s the real point behind both videos: When creating content stops being a chore, creativity shows up again. I’m not thinking: “Is this worth filming?” “Do I have time to edit this?” “Should I save this idea for later?” I just try things. Different styles. Different characters. Different ways of saying the same idea. Because the cost of creating is low. That’s what AI clone content actually gives you — freedom to experiment. When one idea can turn into ten pieces of content… When your voice doesn’t need to be rerecorded… When you’re not starting from zero every time… You stop overthinking. You stop hesitating. You start playing again. And ironically, that’s when output goes way up. Not because you’re grinding — but because creating doesn’t feel heavy anymore. That’s the system behind both of these videos. And that’s exactly what I teach inside Clone Your Way to 5K. How to turn your ideas into reusable assets so you can: -create more -test more -have more fun with it 👇 https://theaiatmmachine.com/27-checkout The goal isn’t to look perfect. It’s to create so easily that you never stop.

If AI feels exciting and frustrating at the same time, you’re not crazy. This is the pattern I see over and over: People are learning tools. Watching demos. Saving prompts. But somehow… nothing really moves. Content still feels inconsistent. Ideas still get stuck in your head. Execution still depends on motivation and time. That gap is the most dangerous place to sit. Not because you’re behind —but because it feels like you’re progressing when you’re really just circling. What most people are missing isn’t another feature or app. It’s foundational skills: - how to think clearly with AI instead of randomly prompting - how to get ideas out of your head without friction - how to stop starting from zero every time - how to build something that doesn’t fall apart when life gets busy When those foundations aren’t there, AI becomes noise instead of leverage. That’s what I’ve been focusing on internally with my agency team — stripping things back to the fundamentals that actually make everything else easier downstream. I’m planning to open up one of those internal trainings to the Skool community so you can see how we approach this from the ground up. No hype. Just the skills that make AI finally click. If you’d want to attend, comment FOUNDATION below. This stuff isn’t flashy — but it’s the difference between “playing with AI” and actually building something with it.

Most people think better prompting means longer prompts. It doesn’t. The biggest mistake I see is people asking AI to produce before it’s allowed to understand. They jump straight to: “Write this.” “Create that.” “Generate ideas.” And then they’re disappointed when the output feels surface-level. One shift changed everything for me: I stopped treating AI like a vending machineand started treating it like a junior strategist. Before I ask it to create anything, I’ll say things like: - “What assumptions are you making here?” - “What information would improve this output?” - “What’s missing from this prompt?” Sometimes I don’t even want an answer yet. I want alignment. That’s when AI starts feeling smart. Good prompting isn’t about clever wording. It’s about slowing down the front end so the back end gets easier. Once I started doing this: - I spent less time fixing outputs - ideas stacked instead of resetting - my thinking became reusable And that’s the real win. Prompts are powerful on their own…but they become unfair when they live inside a repeatable process.

The ceiling most people hit isn’t money. It’s attention. They don’t run out of ideas. They don’t run out of tools. They run out of mental space. Every decision lives in their head: - what to post - what to follow up on - what to work on next Nothing is broken — but nothing compounds either. This is where CEH thinking matters. A Chief Executive Human doesn’t try to manage chaos better. They redesign so chaos never shows up in the first place. The shift for me was realizing: If something repeats, it shouldn’t require thinking. If it requires thinking, it should be documented. If it’s documented, it should eventually run without me. That’s not delegation. That’s intentional design. Most people stay busy because slowing down feels risky. But staying busy is often what keeps growth capped. CEH thinking isn’t about moving faster. It’s about removing ceilings you didn’t know you built. I’m actually planning to host a live training with my internal agency team where we break this down in real time — how we think, design, and decide using CEH principles. If you’d want to sit in on that, comment CEH below. No pitch. Just how this actually works.