Been heads down building out AutoXinity stuff this week and pulled this funnel breakdown together — figured this group would actually appreciate seeing the real numbers instead of me just saying "AI helps close more deals." Setup: home service business, running Facebook ads. Leads get split three ways — AI speed-to-lead, a 48-hour AI follow-up sequence, and an AI voice telesales agent — all feeding into booked calls for their sales team. Simple funnel, nothing fancy. Without AI in that loop: $13,920/month from this funnel. With AI in the loop: $30,359/month. Same spend. Same traffic. Same closers. The only thing that changed was how fast and how persistently the leads got worked. That's: - 71 leads recovered (previously going straight to "lost sales") - 10.8% conversion rate - 20 conversions/month - $197,266 annualized swing And the "lost sales" bucket — leads that never got fast enough follow-up — still had $1,512 sitting there as proof of the leak. Every time I run this breakdown for a new business, the reaction is the same: "wait, we're losing that much just from slow follow-up?" Yeah. Every time. If anyone here is running paid ads and has never actually mapped out where leads are leaking between click and booked call, that's the exercise worth doing before spending more on traffic. Happy to break down how this is built (GHL + AI voice + follow-up sequences) if anyone wants the mechanics — drop a comment.