Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

AI Automation Agency Hub

318k members • Free

AI Automation Society

374.1k members • Free

9 contributions to AI Automation Society
Looking for builders
Anyone here built automated lead pipelines from EU business registries or cold outreach systems? DM me.
0 likes • 28d
Send you a DM
partner
i was thinking of starting an agency a AI agency or any other agency i know how to do thing all i need is person who have to skill to make this thing possible what i mean is i get clients you make the automations. Intrested people DM
0 likes • Mar 30
Hey Adarsh, this is an interesting approach. I run a small AI automation agency and build everything from cold email pipelines to social media automation and custom AI tools for clients. Would be happy to chat about what kind of projects you're looking to take on. Feel free to DM me!
I built a fully automated cold email pipeline with AI. Here's the complete guide (free PDF)
I'm 21 and started my own AI automation agency 2 months ago. My first client came through my network, and the next ones came from posting LinkedIn videos about what I was building. But I wanted something that scales without waiting for inbound. So I built a cold email automation pipeline from scratch. It handles the full flow: - Lead discovery using web scraping (Firecrawl + Google Maps data) - Email verification before any email goes out - AI-powered research per lead: website scrape, competitor analysis, needs analysis - Personalized 3-email sequences generated by AI with A/B testing on - subject lines, approaches and styles - Automated follow-up timing (day 1, day 3, day 7) - Reply detection via IMAP with AI classification into 6 categories - Human approval dashboard so nothing sends without review - Lead recycling for non-responders after 60 days The key insight: cold email is not about volume. It is about deep research per lead so the AI has enough context to write emails that actually feel personal. Every lead goes through a 7-step research process before a single word gets written. I put together a complete guide of 26 pages (PDF attached) that covers the full architecture, the actual AI prompts I use, SMTP setup, warmup strategy, deliverability tips, and the 10 mistakes I made building this. Hope it helps someone here!
0 likes • Mar 25
@Kuldeep Singh Hey , absolutely! I'll send you a DM so we can find a time that works. Looking forward to it
0 likes • Mar 25
@Troy McDougal Awesome! Just sent you a DM. Talk soon
Need some suggestions on this Signal Analyzer
My cold emails were failing. My “personalization” was too. “Loved your post…” = ignored. So I built a signal-based system instead: Hiring spikes Product launches Role changes Real problems across the internet Now it’s: Saw you’re hiring fast — scaling issue? That gets replies. Core is done. Still improving hiring signals. Would mind sharing what signals could get some replies in your niche?
Need some suggestions on this Signal Analyzer
1 like • Mar 18
This is exactly how I approach it too. Generic personalization is dead, signal-based is the way. The signals that work best in my niche (AI automation for small businesses) are job postings mentioning "automation" or "AI", recent website changes (new product pages, blog posts about scaling), and company news like funding rounds or new office locations. Basically anything that hints at growth pain. What I found is that combining two signals in the opener works better than one. Something like "Noticed you just launched [product] and you're hiring for ops. Sounds like things are moving fast." That specificity makes people feel like you actually did your homework, because you did. One thing I'd add to your system: track which signal types get the highest reply rates and double down on those. For me, hiring signals combined with a recent product launch consistently outperform everything else. Would love to hear what reply rates you're seeing so far
Learning AI Tools for the Long Term (Not Just the Update Cycle)
AI tools change fast. New features, new interfaces, new releases — it’s easy to feel like you’re always catching up. But long-term knowledge in AI doesn’t come from tracking updates. It comes from understanding what stays consistent beneath them. Most tools are just different interfaces over the same ideas: input → processing → output. Prompts, data flow, decision logic, and system behavior — these are the parts that transfer across tools, even as they evolve. If you learn the tool, you keep restarting. If you learn the pattern, you keep progressing. The goal isn’t to master every update. It’s to understand how AI fits into workflows — where it adds judgment, where it reduces effort, and where it needs structure. That’s what makes your knowledge durable. When a new tool or update comes out, do you feel like you’re starting over — or just upgrading something you already understand?
Learning AI Tools for the Long Term (Not Just the Update Cycle)
4 likes • Mar 18
This matches my experience. I built a social media automation system in n8n first because it was the fastest way to get something working visually. Now I'm rebuilding it in Python with a serverless setup because I need more control over the logic and error handling. The interesting thing is that the core pattern is exactly the same: content generation, scheduling, platform posting, performance tracking. The tools changed completely but the architecture I designed in n8n transferred straight over. I'm not relearning what to build, just how to express it in code instead of nodes. That's the part most people miss. If you understand data flow and decision logic, switching tools feels like translating between languages rather than starting from scratch.
1-9 of 9
Kyan Cordes
3
17points to level up
@kyan-cordes-4213
21. I build AI automations, cold email pipelines and n8n workflows for small businesses. Sharing what works.

Active 20d ago
Joined Apr 29, 2025
Powered by