In my years in graphic design school, I was fond of Swiss-style designs and principles. I enjoyed modernist art and experimented with minimalistic designs. But after some time, I turned around completely. I started to see the emperor's new clothes for what they were. Experiments, a much-needed response, perhaps. But nonetheless something temporary. I guess I returned to my starting point. A position I believe most people have: The beautiful paintings in the national galleries are real art. The beautiful nineteenth-century buildings around the world are the pinnacle of architecture. The great classical novels still rule as the best literature. In design and typography, it isn't the industrial grotesque typefaces that give the world the beauty it deserves. No. The traditional classic book typefaces that emerged in Italy and France—based on the earliest printing press techniques, which in turn were based on scribes' meticulous work—have become the standard for what a great typeface looks like. Sometimes, I declare: "I only use serifed typefaces in my work" — a way of upholding typographic tradition. Previously, I experimented with combining different typefaces—using sans-serif for headings and humanist antiquas for body text. Now, however, I prefer letting a single typeface family govern the entire publication. I find myself drawn to the established classics: Garamond, Bembo, Sabon, Caslon, Jenson, Baskerville. These time-tested typefaces consistently deliver excellent results. I guess I’ve matured. What about you? What stance do you take? Do you have a guiding principle?